Z52 vs A7C2 Camera Comparison: Which to Buy with a $1.1K Budget in 2025?
康子终于有一个能打的入门机了!z52核心参数和zf相近，可以说是”换皮”zf了。这不就是尼康粉丝们眼中真正的z63嘛。
尼康z52售价10999，a7c2国补完也在1.1w左右。
省流:两者核心视频和连拍照片参数接近。
z52优势在于双卡、evf、机身用料和操控。a7c2优势在于更高像素量，轻便和对焦。
详细参数对比如下↓
1. 传感器与画质
– 尼康Z5 II：全画幅约2450万像素背照式CMOS，EXPEED 7图像处理器
– 索尼A7C II：全画幅约3300万像素背照式Exmor R CMOS，BIONZ XR处理器
– ISO范围：
– Z5 II：100-64000（可扩展）
– A7C II：100-51200（可扩展至50-204800）
2. 防抖与对焦
– 防抖：
– Z5 II：5轴机身防抖（最高7.5档补偿）
– A7C II：5轴机身防抖（最高7档补偿）
– 对焦系统：
– Z5 II：支持9种对象识别（含鸟类、飞机）
– A7C II：759点相位检测+AI实时追踪（人/动物/车辆/昆虫）
3. 连拍与高速拍摄
– 连拍速度：
– Z5 II：11fps（RAW）/15fps（JPG），支持预拍摄C30模式
– A7C II：10fps（RAW/JPG）
4. 视频性能
– Z5 II：
– 6K超采样4K 30p（全画幅）
– DX裁切4K 60p
– 10bit H.265 N-Log内录，支持N-RAW（4K 30p）
– A7C II：
– 7K超采样4K 30p（全画幅）
– S35裁切（APS-C）4K 60p
– 10bit S-Log3/S-Cinetone
5. 取景器与屏幕
– 取景器：
– Z5 II：369万点OLED（3000cd/m²高亮度）
– A7C II：236万点OLED
– 屏幕：
– Z5 II：3.2英寸210万点旋转触摸屏
– A7C II：3.0英寸103万点侧翻触摸屏
6. 机身设计与存储
– 材质与重量：
– Z5 II：镁合金机身（前/后/顶部）约700g（含电池）
– A7C II：镁合金+复合材料，约514g（含电池）
– 存储卡槽：
– Z5 II：双UHS-II SD卡槽（支持双卡备份）
– A7C II：单UHS-II SD卡槽（不支持CFexpress）
7. 电池与接口
– 电池续航：
– Z5 II：EN-EL15c（约420张）
– A7C II：NP-FZ100（约540张）
– 接口：
– Z5 II：USB-C 10Gbps（支持UVC/UAC）
– A7C II：USB-C 5Gbps（支持UVC）
8. 特色功能
– Z5 II：
– 预拍摄C30高速捕捉
– 尼康云创服务，独立优化校准按钮
– A7C II：
– AI自动构图
– 创意外观模式，电影感色彩预设
Edward Grant 
Ada Stephens 
Bennett Schmidt
The Z52 seems like a solid choice if you prioritize dual cards and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution and lighter weight are big pluses too. It really comes down to whether video or stills are more important for your needs—Nikon’s focus features are great, but Sony’s pixel count is hard to ignore.
The Z52 seems like a solid option for those who prioritize dual card slots and build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution sensor is tempting for sharper stills. Ultimately, it comes down to whether video or photo needs are more important—I’d lean towards the Z52 if I needed better ergonomics.
I’m torn between these two. The Z52’s dual card slots and better build feel are big pluses for me, but the A7C2’s higher resolution and lighter weight are tempting too. At this price point, it really comes down to whether I prioritize stills or video more. Guess I’ll have to go shoot with both before deciding!
That’s a great observation! Both cameras have their strengths, so it really depends on your priorities. If stills are your main focus, the Z52’s build quality and dual card slots will serve you well. But if you’re leaning toward video, the A7C2’s resolution and portability could be hard to resist. Either way, test-driving both is the smart move—enjoy the hands-on research!
I think the Z52 is a strong contender with its dual card slots and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution sensor and AI-enhanced autofocus could be a game-changer for certain shooters. Ultimately, it really depends on whether you prioritize video capabilities or still photography features within that budget. The Z52 feels like a more “prosumer” option while the A7C2 leans more consumer-friendly in terms of size and weight.
The Z52 seems like a solid option if you prioritize dual card slots and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution sensor and lighter weight are big pluses too. It’s tough to go wrong either way, especially since their core specs are so close. I think it really comes down to whether you want more pixels or more ruggedness in your camera.
The Z52 seems like a solid choice if you prioritize dual cards and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution sensor and AI-driven autofocus could be a game-changer for certain shooters. It’s tough to go wrong either way with these options within the budget, so personal preference might ultimately tip the scale. I wonder how the video capabilities compare since both cameras seem strong in stills.
You’re absolutely right! The Z52 offers robust video features with its dual card slots and reliable build, while the A7C2 shines with its advanced video autofocus and higher resolution. Both cameras handle stills beautifully, but if videography is key for you, testing them in person can reveal which workflow suits your style better. Thanks for bringing up such insightful points—personal needs truly make the decision unique!
The Z52 seems like a solid choice if you prioritize dual card slots and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution and lighter weight could be a game-changer for travel photographers. It’s tough to go wrong either way with these options around the same price point, so it really depends on what features matter most to you.
The Z52 seems like a solid choice if you prioritize dual card slots and better build quality, but the A7C II’s higher resolution and AI-driven autofocus could be a game-changer for certain types of shooters. It’s tough to go wrong with either at this price point, so it really depends on whether you need those extra megapixels or prefer Nikon’s handling.
The Z52 seems like a solid choice if you prioritize dual cards and better build quality, but the A7C2’s higher resolution and lighter weight are tempting for those who need more megapixels. I’d personally lean towards the Z52 for its versatility, especially with that awesome bird and plane recognition focus mode. It’s a tough call though—both cameras feel really strong within this budget range.
I’m torn between these two—both seem solid options for the price. The Z52’s dual card slots and better build feel like big perks, but the A7C2’s higher resolution and lighter weight are tempting too. It really depends on whether I prioritize stills or video more.