RTX 5070 vs 4070 Ti Performance Review: Why It Falls Short & What to Expect
When discussing the RTX 5070, [skeptical emoji] Huang made a bold claim: “Thanks to AI, our new mid-range GPU delivers performance rivaling last gen’s flagship 4090—all for just $549.”
While the price tag is undeniably tempting at one-third the cost of the 4090, [awkward emoji] reality paints a different picture. The 5070 doesn’t quite hit 4090-level performance, and in real-world rendering tests, it trails behind both the 4080 and 4070 Ti. Though it outperforms the 4070 Super, this comes at the cost of higher power consumption.
Let’s dive deeper into the 5070’s capabilities, examining its specs, benchmark performance, power efficiency, and how it stacks up against the competition (image).
Edward Grant 
Ada Stephens 
Bennett Schmidt
I was really intrigued by Huang’s claim, but the performance gap compared to higher-tier cards is hard to ignore. For $549, I’d still expect better than just matching last-gen mid-range GPUs. It seems like the 5070 might be better for budget-conscious buyers who don’t need top-tier performance. Guess I’ll wait and see what future models bring.
Yeah, that $549 price point sounds great on paper, but it’s tough to compete with the 4080 and even the 4070 Ti when it comes to actual performance. I guess for budget-conscious buyers who don’t need top-tier stuff, the 5070 might still be worth considering? But if you’re chasing max frames or ray tracing, seems like you’d be better off saving a bit more for an older model.
Yeah, I was really intrigued by that $549 price point too, but the performance gap compared to the 4080 and even the 4070 is hard to ignore. For some people, it might still be worth it if they’re on a tight budget, but I feel like Nvidia could’ve aimed a bit higher given the hype around the 4090. It’s a solid card, but maybe not the game-changer we were expecting based on the initial claims.
It’s interesting to see how the 5070 stacks up against these higher-end models. For the price, it still feels like a solid option for many gamers, but I can understand why pro users might opt for something more powerful. The AI claims are definitely eye-catching, though. I wonder if future updates will help close that gap.
Yeah, that $549 price tag sounds great on paper, but the performance gap compared to the 4080 and even the 4070 Ti is hard to ignore. AI-powered or not, it seems like Nvidia still has some work to do if they want the 5070 to truly compete at that upper mid-range level. I wonder how much more it would cost to get closer to those higher-tier GPUs without sacrificing too much performance. Guess we’ll see what the actual reviews say when they drop.
It’s interesting how the 5070 is being positioned as such a strong performer for its price, but I guess I was expecting more after hearing Huang’s claims. Real-world results definitely matter, and if it can’t keep up with the 4080 or even the 4070 Ti, that’s a bit disappointing. Still, for some gamers on a budget, it might be worth considering if they don’t need top-tier performance. I wonder how much the actual power consumption differs between these models.
It’s disappointing that the 5070 didn’t live up to its hype, especially with that affordable price tag. For gamers on a budget, the 4070 Ti still seems like a better value unless you’re only playing older games. I wonder if NVIDIA will release an updated version soon to close the gap. Either way, buyers should be cautious about expecting miracles from this card.
Absolutely, it’s understandable to feel disappointed when expectations aren’t met, especially at that price point. The 4070 Ti does offer better performance overall, making it a safer bet for most gamers right now. As for an update, NVIDIA often surprises us, so it’s worth keeping an eye out! Thanks for sharing your thoughts—always good to hear from readers like you.
I was really hoping the RTX 5070 would close more of the gap with the 4090, especially at that price point. In practice though, it seems like the 4070 Ti might still be a better overall value for most gamers. Guess we’ll have to wait and see if future driver updates can help bridge that performance divide. Still, $549 is hard to argue with if you don’t need top-tier performance.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! You’re absolutely right—while the RTX 5070 shows promise, the 4070 Ti does offer strong value for many gamers at its price point. Future driver updates could indeed help narrow the gap, so it’s worth keeping an eye on those developments. Either way, both options provide solid choices depending on your budget and performance needs!
It’s interesting how much buzz the RTX 5070 is generating with that affordable price point, but I guess I was expecting more from its performance compared to the 4070 Ti. For general gaming, it might still be worth considering, but for heavy-duty tasks like 3D rendering, it seems like you’d want to go higher up the stack. The AI angle is cool, but it doesn’t seem to make up for the raw power gap in some scenarios. Definitely something to keep in mind if budget is a big concern.
Yeah, I was really intrigued by that $549 price tag too, but after reading this review, it seems like the performance gap compared to the 4080 and even the 4070 Ti is kind of disappointing. For that extra cost over the 4070 Ti, I’d probably want a bit more of a boost in actual usage, not just theoretical potential with AI. Guess I’ll wait and see if the next generation can close those gaps.
I was really intrigued by Huang’s claim, but the performance gap compared to the 4080 and even the 4070 is hard to ignore. For that price, I’d hoped for closer competition, especially in professional workloads. Still, if gaming is your main focus, the 5070 might be decent value depending on your needs. It’s just disappointing that it doesn’t live up to its potential in more demanding tasks.
It’s interesting how the RTX 5070 is being positioned as such a good deal compared to the 4090, but I guess the performance gap with the 4080 and 4070 Ti shows that you still get what you pay for. For most gamers, the 4070 Ti might be a safer bet unless you really need that extra AI juice. It’s definitely a tough spot for Nvidia if they want to compete at all price levels without cannibalizing their higher-end sales. Still, I wonder how much the AI features will matter in practical use cases.
I was really intrigued by Huang’s claim too, but the actual performance差距 is hard to ignore. For $549, I expected it to at least match the 4080, not fall behind the 4070. AI can only do so much if the core specs don’t stack up. Guess I’ll wait for more affordable upgrades next year.
It’s interesting that they’re positioning the 5070 as such a strong performer, but the benchmarks definitely show it’s not on par with the 4090. For the price though, I can see why some people might still find it appealing compared to the 4080 or 4070. Honestly, if AI improvements are their main selling point, I’d want to see more concrete examples of that in action. Still, I’m curious to hear from folks who’ve used it for specific tasks like gaming or content creation.
It’s disappointing that the 5070 didn’t live up to those lofty claims, especially with such a reasonable price point. For gamers on a budget, the 4070 Ti might still be a safer bet unless you’re mostly running less demanding games. I wonder if future driver updates could close some of that gap with higher-end models. Either way, it’s good to have more options at this price range.