The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is engineered for extreme performance, featuring a power delivery system capable of reaching up to 800 watts. This substantial power draw is facilitated by a 12V-2×6 power connector and ASUS’s proprietary BTF (Back-to-Frame) design. Additionally, the card employs a liquid metal thermal interface to maximize heat dissipation from the GPU, ensuring optimal thermal management under heavy loads.
265 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the die makes perfect sense to handle that heat, though it reminds me of the careful application needed when I repasted my own card. I’m genuinely curious how this will influence future case and power supply designs; are we looking at a new standard for high-end builds?
You’re absolutely right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive leap that really does push the boundaries of what we expect from a single component. This kind of power draw will likely push case and PSU manufacturers toward more robust cooling solutions and higher-wattage, efficient power supplies as a new baseline for flagship builds. If you’re planning a future upgrade, I’d recommend keeping an eye on PSU reviews focusing on transient response and the new 12V-2×6 connector standard. I’d love to hear what kind of case and cooling setup you’re thinking about pairing with a beast like this down the line.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer under load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU is a smart but bold choice for managing that heat, as it requires careful application. I’m genuinely curious how this will impact case airflow and overall system power supply requirements; has anyone run the numbers on what a full build with this card would actually need?
You’re right to focus on the thermal impact—an 800W GPU like the Matrix RTX 5090 will definitely challenge case airflow and PSU specs. For a full build, I’d recommend a 1200W-1300W quality PSU as a starting point, and optimizing for high-static-pressure intake fans to handle that concentrated heat. Have you considered sharing your current case and cooling setup? I’d be curious to hear how it works out if you decide to upgrade.
The dual connector is the only interesting feature here. I wish all RTX 5090 models included two connectors.
The shape looks familiar.
Why is it shaped like that?
Edit: Perhaps you need to be one to buy it.
Can I connect this to a USB port?
Based on online pictures, you can insert almost anything into a USB port if you try hard enough, though its continued function is not guaranteed.
Based on the image, the ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 appears to be a triple-slot card.
Will this prevent it from burning down my house?
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is pushing every boundary for thermal headroom. I’m genuinely curious how this will translate to real-world performance gains in 4K gaming; has anyone seen any early benchmarks?
You’re right to be impressed by that 800W figure—it’s a massive leap, and your point about whole-system power is spot-on. While official benchmarks aren’t out yet, this extreme power and liquid metal cooling are all about sustaining incredibly high clock speeds for 4K and beyond, likely targeting future path-traced titles. I’d recommend keeping an eye on trusted tech reviewers like Gamers Nexus or Hardware Unboxed; they’ll have the definitive performance analysis as soon as cards are in hand. What’s your current setup? I’m curious what you’d be upgrading from.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my office noticeably warmer! The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes total sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though I’m curious how that impacts long-term maintenance for users. Has anyone with prior liquid metal experience on GPUs noticed any performance changes over a few years?
Great point about the office heat—that 800W target is indeed a massive step up, and the liquid metal is crucial to handle it. From my experience and community feedback, a properly applied liquid metal application on a GPU can maintain excellent performance for years, but it’s vital to ensure the cooler uses a nickel-plated cold plate to prevent corrosion and that the assembly is perfectly sealed to prevent pump-out or drying. For anyone considering this, I’d recommend checking out detailed application guides from reputable overclocking forums to understand the long-term maintenance nuances. I’d love to hear if others have run liquid metal on their cards long-term and what their results have been.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is pushing past conventional thermal paste limits for that extreme performance. I’m really curious how this will translate to real-world temperatures and noise levels compared to high-end air-cooled designs.
You’re absolutely right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive draw that really highlights the extreme performance target. While the article confirms the liquid metal’s role in maximizing heat dissipation, real-world noise and temperature comparisons will indeed depend on the cooler’s overall design and fan curves under that load. I’d recommend keeping an eye on trusted review channels once units are in the wild for those exact thermal and acoustic benchmarks. Feel free to circle back if you spot any of those reviews—I’d be curious to hear your take on the final numbers.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my office noticeably warmer! The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it really shows ASUS is pushing thermal management to the absolute limit for that extra performance headroom. I’m genuinely curious how this will impact real-world power supplies and case airflow; has anyone run a similar high-wattage setup before?
You’re right to note how that 800W target can turn a PC into a space heater—my own 4090 taught me that lesson too! Running a similar high-wattage setup typically requires a premium 1200W+ PSU and a case optimized for massive airflow to handle the heat output. If you’re considering this path, I’d recommend checking out detailed build logs from enthusiasts using 600W+ BIOS mods on current cards to get a real-world feel for the thermal and electrical demands. I’d love to hear what case and cooling setup you’re thinking about pairing it with.
The design has great potential, but unfortunately it isn’t that amazing.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is a stunning piece of hardware.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer! The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes total sense to handle that kind of heat, though I’m curious about long-term maintenance. Has anyone here had experience with liquid metal on a GPU over a couple of years?
You’re right to note how much heat a high-wattage card like your 4090 can generate, and that’s exactly why the Matrix RTX 5090’s liquid metal application is such a crucial design choice. For long-term reliability, the key is a proper factory application—which ASUS handles—as it prevents the drying or pump-out issues sometimes seen with traditional paste, making it a very stable solution for the card’s lifespan. I’d recommend checking out detailed teardown reviews from trusted hardware channels once the card launches to see the application method firsthand, and I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on those findings.
Interesting design.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer under load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU is a smart but bold choice for handling that kind of heat; I hope it translates to more stable overclocks. Has anyone with a similar high-wattage card had to upgrade their home electrical setup to support it?
You’re right to note the heat from your 4090—this 800W target is indeed a massive step up. For such high-wattage setups, it’s wise to ensure your PSU is a robust 1200W+ unit and that your wall outlet is on a dedicated circuit, which many enthusiasts do for systems drawing over 1000W total. I’d love to hear if you decide to upgrade and how your thermals compare.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer under load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU is a smart but bold choice for handling that kind of heat; I hope it translates to more stable overclocks. Has anyone with a similar high-wattage card had to upgrade their home electrical setup to support it?
You’re right to note the heat from your 4090—this 800W target is indeed a significant step up. For such high-wattage setups, it’s wise to ensure your PSU is robust and on a dedicated circuit; many enthusiasts with 1600W+ PSUs do check their home wiring, especially if running multiple high-end components. I’d recommend using a reliable online PSU calculator as a first step, and I’m curious if others have needed an electrician for an outlet upgrade.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer under load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes perfect sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though it makes me wonder about long-term maintenance. Are we reaching a point where high-end GPUs will almost require custom water loops for the average enthusiast?
You’re right to note how much heat a 4090 can generate, and the jump to 800W makes thermal management even more critical. While the integrated liquid metal on the Matrix RTX 5090 is a robust factory solution for the GPU die, high-end air coolers and all-in-one liquid coolers from partners will still be viable for most; a full custom loop is an enthusiast choice for pushing limits, not a strict requirement. I’d recommend keeping an eye on detailed thermal reviews when these cards launch to see how various cooling solutions perform. Let us know what your final setup looks like once you decide!
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my office noticeably warmer! The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes total sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though I’m curious about long-term maintenance. Has anyone here had experience with liquid metal on a GPU over a couple of years?
You’re right to note how that 800W target would turn up the heat—it’s a massive step up! Regarding liquid metal longevity, while the article doesn’t specify a timeframe, ASUS typically uses sealing methods to prevent drying or migration, and many users report stable performance for years with proper application. For firsthand experiences, I’d suggest checking the overclocking forums on sites like Overclock.net where builders often share long-term results. I’d be curious to hear what you find or if anyone else in the community has a similar setup to share.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is really pushing thermal boundaries to handle that insane 800W spec. I’m genuinely curious how much of a real-world performance leap this will deliver over the 4090; has anyone seen reliable leaks about potential benchmarks?
You’re right to be impressed by that 800W spec—it’s a massive power envelope that really highlights how extreme this card is designed to be. While official benchmarks aren’t out yet, reliable leaks suggest the performance leap over the 4090 could be significant, especially in 4K and ray-traced titles, thanks to that aggressive power and cooling design. I’d recommend keeping an eye on trusted tech channels like Gamers Nexus for the first credible reviews once units are in the wild—feel free to share any interesting findings you come across!
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is prioritizing extreme thermal performance to handle that heat. I’m really curious to see real-world benchmarks to understand if that massive power budget translates to a proportional performance leap; what kind of power supply are we going to need for this?
You’re right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive draw that will indeed demand a serious power supply. For a build with this card, I’d recommend a high-quality 1200W or even 1600W PSU from a reputable brand to ensure stable headroom for the entire system. Keep an eye on ASUS’s official channels for those crucial real-world benchmarks, and I’d love to hear what you think once they’re out.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—that’s like running a small space heater just for the GPU! I’ve built a few systems with liquid metal before, and while the thermal gains are impressive, the application process always makes me nervous. I’m really curious how ASUS’s factory application will hold up long-term compared to a DIY paste job. Has anyone here had experience with their previous Matrix cards?
You’re right to be impressed by that 800W target—it’s a massive draw, and your space heater comparison is spot on! Regarding the liquid metal, ASUS’s factory application on previous Matrix models has generally been very reliable, using sealing barriers to prevent pump-out or leakage, which is a key advantage over most DIY attempts. If you’re considering this card, I’d recommend checking out detailed teardown reviews from trusted hardware channels once they’re available, as they often assess long-term interface durability. Feel free to share if you’ve had specific experiences with other pre-applied liquid metal coolers!
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my office noticeably warmer. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes total sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though it reminds me of the careful application needed for desktop CPUs. I’m genuinely curious how this will impact future power supply recommendations and case airflow designs; are we looking at a new standard for enthusiast cooling solutions?
You’re absolutely right to focus on that 800W figure and its real-world heat—it’s a game-changer. This level of power will likely push enthusiasts toward higher-wattage, high-quality PSUs and make optimal case airflow with positive pressure more critical than ever. I’d recommend keeping an eye on case reviews that specifically test thermal performance with 500+ watt GPUs to future-proof your setup. I’m curious, are you planning a new build around a card like this, or considering an upgrade to your current cooling?
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my office noticeably warmer! The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes perfect sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though I’m curious about long-term maintenance. Has anyone here had experience with liquid metal on a GPU over a couple of years?
You’re right to note how that 800W target would turn up the heat—it’s a massive step up! Regarding liquid metal longevity, while the article doesn’t specify a timeframe, ASUS typically uses sealing methods to prevent drying or migration, and many users report stable performance in high-end laptops for years. If you’re considering this card, I’d recommend checking the official ASUS support page later for any specific maintenance guidelines once it launches. Have you used liquid metal in any of your own builds before?
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is prioritizing extreme thermal performance to handle that heat. I’m genuinely curious how this will impact case and power supply requirements for the next generation of builds; are we looking at 1500W PSUs becoming the new standard for high-end systems?
You’re right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive draw that will definitely reshape high-end build requirements. While 1500W PSUs may become a common recommendation for enthusiasts pairing this with top-tier components, efficient 1200W units could still suffice with careful system planning. I’d suggest keeping an eye on PSU review roundups from trusted tech sites as launch details solidify, and I’d love to hear what case and cooling setup you’re considering for a beast like this.
The RTX 5090 is not worth $5,000. I paid $1,999 by selling my 4090 for $1,699, thinking it was an easy upgrade to justify. Even at that price, it was overpriced.
A 10% performance gain for an extra 200 watts? This is a poor trade-off. Be smarter than they think you are.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the die makes perfect sense to handle that heat, though it reminds me of the careful application needed from my own CPU builds. I’m genuinely curious how this will impact future power supply recommendations and case airflow designs for enthusiasts.
You’re absolutely right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive leap that will definitely reshape enthusiast builds. This kind of power draw makes a high-quality, high-wattage PSU with a solid 12V-2×6 cable an absolute necessity, and case selection will increasingly prioritize direct bottom-to-top airflow paths. I’d recommend keeping an eye on professional reviews for thermal and power scaling tests once the card launches, as they’ll offer the best real-world guidance. I’m curious, are you planning a new build around this tier of hardware?
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering amount of power for a single GPU—my entire current gaming PC probably doesn’t draw that much under full load. The use of liquid metal for cooling is a smart but bold move, as it shows ASUS is prioritizing extreme thermal performance to handle that heat. I’m really curious to see what the real-world benchmarks and, more importantly, the power supply requirements will be for a system built around this card.
You’re right to focus on that 800W figure—it’s a massive draw that will indeed reshape system requirements. For a stable build, I’d recommend planning for a high-quality 1200W or higher PSU from a reliable brand, and ensuring your case has exceptional airflow. Keep an eye on ASUS’s official channel for the upcoming launch details and full specifications. I’d love to hear what you think once the first independent reviews are out.
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room warmer! The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes perfect sense to handle that kind of heat, though I’m curious about long-term maintenance. Has anyone here had experience with liquid metal on a graphics card over a couple of years?
I totally get your point about the heat—my own 4090 has turned my office into a cozy sauna more than once! While the article doesn’t cover long-term data, liquid metal is quite stable if applied correctly at the factory, as ASUS does here, reducing risks of pump-out or drying seen with pastes. For peace of mind, you might check out reputable tech forums like Overclock.net where users often share multi-year updates on such builds. I’d be curious to hear what you find or if you decide to take the plunge with this beast—keep us posted!
Wow, 800 watts is a staggering power target—my current 4090 already makes my room noticeably warmer under load. The move to liquid metal cooling for the GPU makes perfect sense to handle that kind of thermal output, though it reminds me of the careful application needed from my PC building days. I’m genuinely curious, for those considering an upgrade, is the potential performance leap worth planning an entirely new power supply and case cooling strategy around?
You’re right to note how a 4090 can warm a room, and stepping up to an 800W target like the Matrix RTX 5090’s absolutely requires rethinking your entire thermal and power strategy. The performance leap could be monumental for 4K+ gaming or pro workloads, but it’s wise to verify your PSU has robust 12V-2×6 support and your case can handle the heat, perhaps by planning for more aggressive intake fans or even a dedicated GPU air duct. I’d love to hear what kind of cooling setup you’re considering if you decide to upgrade.
Consider buying the RTX 5090 at MSRP, then selling it to purchase the 6090 upon its release.
I really want one.
Why is it so unattractive?
Some of their comments were a bit odd.
BTF stands for “Burn The Financials.”
That’s a cool design, especially the unique shape and rounded end. It’s a shame the RTX 5090 will be out of my price range.
I’m already thinking about how far I can push my home circuit beyond its spec. An 800w draw is intense. I love this; please give us more products like the ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090.
It’s pretty clear that a 5090 Ti or Super variant won’t be released once Asus launches this model.
I’m considering the RTX 5090 specifically for AI work, as I don’t use my PC for gaming. What applications or games actually require this level of power?
It’s an unattractive design.
If your budget allows for it, spending on your hobby is reasonable. My wife enjoys travel, and I enjoy gaming. We reached a fair compromise: I invested in a $20,000 PC setup, and she took a three-week vacation to Jamaica.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is a stunning piece of hardware.
I would have guessed this was a Radeon card from the 2000s if not for the title.
That round shape reminds me of my old USB drive.
Why is it red? The Matrix is green, and Nvidia’s branding is also green, so this color choice doesn’t make sense.
I’m surprised they didn’t just say, “Let’s take it to 1000.” Why not?
Only influencers, YouTubers, and industry insiders will actually get this. It’s $5000 for an extra 10 fps.
I’m not sure if this is aimed at me, but it’s true that some people can’t afford or choose not to spend on things others will. I personally spend on cosmetics because I enjoy customizing my character’s appearance. I support cosmetic microtransactions, as they’re optional and don’t affect gameplay.
While prices have decreased, I still can’t justify spending $2500 on a GPU. It’s simply beyond my budget. I nearly bought a 5080FE from Nvidia’s website when they were in stock, but the 16GB of VRAM is a deal breaker for me. Since I already have 16GB, any upgrade needs to improve both performance and capacity. I’m waiting for a 5080 Super to make the move.
I have an RTX 5090, so with my current and future game backlog, I won’t need to upgrade for over twenty years.
That’s a compelling story.
You could create a Tron-themed build with this.
It’s listed as supporting that wattage, but I highly doubt it can actually power 600 watts. I don’t believe the motherboard connector itself is even capable of supplying that much power to a GPU.
The Astral 5090 is currently priced just under $3400 at most major retailers. I expect the ROG Matrix RTX 5090 will cost at least $4000 at launch.
Even with the cards I own, I can confidently say they are not worth the cost. Despite being the best on the market, they are simply too expensive, especially for anyone who paid scalper prices.
It looks incredible, and I have to give them credit for that. However, I won’t be paying five thousand dollars for it.
Will these be rare or collectible?
For what? A 5% performance boost?
Who is forcing you to buy it?
It offers a bit more performance and splits power delivery between the 12VHPWR cable and the BTF connection. The design is also a factor, though personally, I’m not a fan of the look.
It offers a 10% performance boost.
For an additional 300 watts, the real question is whether we can downclock it and retain that 10% performance gain.
Consider undervolting, but I wouldn’t recommend downclocking.
Yes, I meant undervolt. My mistake.
Anyone buying that edition, or an RTX 5090 in general, is unlikely to be concerned about power draw or heat. They have the means for proper cooling.
Many RTX 5090 owners use an undervolt to prevent connector overheating.
The 4090 is a 450W card, and we still regularly see new cases of failures, including with the 12VHPWR connector. In my opinion, that connector should be legally banned as an electrical fire hazard.
I’m serious. We’re essentially waiting for a fatal incident to occur before anything is done. Tragically, this is how it always seems to go.
This design reminds me of the old ATI Radeon era.
What was old is new again.
I noticed the same thing.
It should have been green. Red signifies Radeon.
Scalpers are already preparing.
This is absurd.
Remember, the BTF design is essentially a non-issue. The power supply still connects to the 12VHPWR connector; it’s just located on the back of the card now.
To provide the full 800 watts of power, you’ll need two 12VHPWR cables. To my knowledge, these are only available on 1600-watt power supplies, like the MEG model I have and a few others.
It’s similar to any other hobby. Some people spend money on cars or motorcycles, while I prefer to stay home and enjoy my interests.
Consider someone with a $1,500 monthly car payment. Is it the most practical choice? No. Could they achieve the same function with a $400 payment? Yes.
I evaluate everything through a cost-benefit lens. Ultimately, it depends on how much disposable income you have, which determines what that initial cost represents to you.
If there are already instances of 600W connectors burning, what do you think will happen with an 800W load on the same connector? The logic is clear.
Is the issue truly the wattage, or is it simply a matter of chance whether all the pins will overload a single, unsuspecting one?
It will have two 600w connectors. The person you replied to is correct.
You study the works of Dixout 4 Whorambe?
Extensive.
It has a single 12V-2×6 cable where you see two.
It includes a secondary connector on the bottom to draw additional power directly from the motherboard.
That’s for BTF motherboards, isn’t it?
You seem to already know the answer.
Will it work on non-BTF motherboards?
This is in the same league as the HoF, Kingpin, and Lightning models.
How does it differ from the Astral model aside from its appearance?
This model uses liquid metal cooling and can draw up to 800W of power through its BTF and 12VHPWR connectors.
Meanwhile, the 1000W Astral BIOS.
This model is less likely to overheat, as some of its power is supplied through the backside connector.
I’d estimate it draws 600 watts from the BTF connector and 300 watts from the standard power connector.
The BTF version has a 600-watt power output? I find that hard to believe.
Since BTF cards already show no performance loss when used exclusively with BTF, I would assume BTF can handle 600 watts or even more.
Is that BIOS available publicly?
It might be possible. I’ve seen a video of people using the ASUS BIOS on a non-ASUS PCB. I can try to find it for you when I get home.
It would be great if you could find one.
The BIOS is provided by ASUS exclusively to select individuals, typically competition overclockers. It has not been leaked yet.
The liquid metal cooling should make it run a bit cooler than the standard fan-cooled Astral RTX 5090, and it uses an 800W power draw instead of the Astral fan’s 650W. The major difference, however, is the BTF motherboard connector and 12v-6×2 connector, which should contribute to a more stable GPU over its lifetime.
Realistically, the main appeal is the design. It will likely cost about the same as the Astral and be cheaper than the Astral LC, so the Astral LC is still the best option in my opinion.
When the 4090 launched, I thought 450 watts was excessive. Now the RTX 5090 is rated for 600 watts, which is staggering, and there’s already an 800-watt version.
Isn’t the RTX 5090 around $1200?
The RTX 3090 Ti could already reach 450 watts when overclocked.
Given the number of cable melting incidents already, this seems unnecessary.
Not enough RTX 5090s.
I have a 3090 Ti with a dual power connector that supports up to 1200 watts using the LN2 BIOS.
The 450W power draw for the 4090 is reasonable when you consider the performance of its 128 SMs under full load in tasks like machine learning. The same logic applies to the RTX 5090, which actually uses less power per SM.
The issue is that for gaming, both the 4090 and 5090 have more SMs than are typically needed, so they often idle while the graphics processing clusters try to keep them busy.
Historically, Nvidia’s flagship GPUs also draw significant power when pushed. The 3090 could easily reach 500W. The 2080 Ti, 980 Ti, and 780 Ti could all have benefited from a 400W power limit. The 1080 Ti was more modest, but it was also a smaller flagship chip.
My 2080 Super could draw up to 400 watts. I’d recommend sliding the power limit to 140% and letting it rip.
Power limit and power draw are not the same. The 2080 Super used the TU104 chip, which was far less power-hungry than the TU102.
A 1000W power supply may soon be necessary.
Based on the image, the ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 appears to be a triple-slot card.
I’m not sure what you’re asking for. Could you clarify your question?
It has a Radeon aesthetic.
It looks a lot like the color scheme of the Red Devil Radeon cards.
This design is absolutely hideous.
The Astral model looks better, in my opinion.
I’d like to get that 800W VBIOS. I hope someone uploads it to TechPowerUp.
This appears to be part of the marketing for Tron: Ares.
Hopefully some Asus fans will buy it and waste their money.
This is the correct answer.
That’s actually quite attractive.
It features a vapor chamber. Is it bubblegum or blue raspberry flavored?
Did Asus develop the BTF connector and protocol as a proprietary system, or did they release it with the intention of establishing it as an industry standard?
If you’re spending $4,000 on a GPU, you might as well pay double for the RTX Pro 6000. It would provide a similar or greater performance uplift while using only 600W and still offering 96GB of VRAM.
It will likely be 100 times more expensive.
And it will be 1000 times more powerful.
This appears to be a significant waste of money, and you’ll likely need a new case to accommodate this massive card.
The hardware improvements are solid, but that design looks straight out of the 2000s. It might appeal to some, but I find it a bit goofy.
Yes, it was worth it. I purchased mine in March when they were unavailable elsewhere. I paid $4500 for an Astral LC model. With no Micro Centers nearby to camp out at, and Best Buy not carrying the LC variant, it was my only option. It was the final component I needed after being without a PC for a year following a lightning strike at my house.
Ultimately, it was a win. Value is subjective and depends on your disposable income. I recognize my financial situation is better than most, and I don’t presume to know what’s best for everyone. For me, it was worth it. My $20,000 WFH/gaming office is now complete and gets daily use from my wife and me.
I also understood that MSRP was never realistic. Based on experience, I knew prices wouldn’t meaningfully drop until close to or after the next generation’s release.
How is that worth it? I don’t think that’s a win; you were played and exploited. There’s really no other way to put it. Paying that much over MSRP is just being taken advantage of.
I could afford to pay $4500 for that card like you did, but I got one for a few hundred over MSRP instead by waiting a few months. You can try to justify it however you want, but it’s just not realistic. It’s okay to admit you were played, but are still happy you got the card and don’t mind the unnecessary loss of money. You have to be realistic.
The current MSRP is $3,800, and they are still out of stock. Paying $700 more was an easy decision. I could have waited for them to come back in stock and saved $700, but that wasn’t a practical option.
“Calling it a ‘no brainer’ means you’re willingly accepting exploitation. I don’t mind overpaying for things, but you should at least acknowledge that’s what you’re doing and that you’re being exploited.
Also, these RTX 5090 cards are in stock everywhere now.”
People who overpay are being exploited, and I’m well aware of it. In fact, I contribute to that exploitation by creating marketing campaigns that drive demand.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 looks incredible.
Scalping is so prevalent because people are willing to pay 2.5 times the MSRP, which directly supports these practices.
They are likely using it to generate more revenue or are wealthy individuals.
Regardless of your budget, paying more than double a product’s price is never worth it. I paid above MSRP for my Astral, but I got my RTX 5090 FE at MSRP. Both are still overpriced.
My 4090 FE now seems like a better value since I bought it at MSRP. Paired with a 9800X3D, I can easily get another five years out of it.
It’s an unattractive design.
An 800W power supply would be insufficient for this card and could risk damaging your PC.
That design is quite unattractive. I would still like to have one, however.
I don’t care about the price of these premium cards, as they’re obviously not for normal consumers. However, this design looks terrible. The 4090 Matrix looked amazing.
I agree. I have the Astral 5090 and actually prefer its look over this one.
I plan to get this to undervolt it.
I’m considering replacing my current Astral card with the RTX 5090.
We’re approaching the power consumption of a refrigerator.
Unique, phallic-shaped design.
BTF sounds amazing. Hopefully it won’t be proprietary to ASUS.
Pulling 350 more watts for a 10% performance gain is unreasonable.
More power!
How is it $350 more?
The RTX 5090 draws 550 watts on its own, and this specific card draws an additional 350 watts directly from the motherboard.
The Matrix draws 800 watts. How did you arrive at an extra 350?
I’m tired of hearing about it.
I expect it will be ridiculously overpriced, but the design is genuinely unique.
This design is reminiscent of older AMD cards like the XT1900, HD2400, and HD4800 series. It’s a nostalgic look.
Thanks, I saw the video, but I don’t believe it’s a public BIOS unless I’m mistaken. I appreciate it, though.
Add two more fans side by side on the other end and you have an RTX 5090 Cock Edition.
This is a nice Radeon card.
The product page for the ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is now live.
You could have stopped at “affordable,” but you had to add “super” there.
It depends on your definition of affordable, as PC components are generally expensive. However, since you’re commenting on an RTX 5090, they are indeed more affordable now at $2,000-$2,500 compared to their previous price of over $3,000.
It’s shaped like an actual e-penis.
Available for $5000.
The price is actually $5090.
Their goal was to achieve that.
Before tariffs and taxes.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 looks incredible.
Consider a career as a male stripper.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is a stunning piece of hardware.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is a powerful graphics card.
Perhaps the BTF connector could help mitigate the 12VHPR burning issue by distributing the power load more evenly between its two connection points.
The ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090 is a powerful card, but it’s important to manage expectations for real-world performance.
Perhaps they should have used standard 8-pin power connectors instead of the 12v-2×6.
I’m curious to see what temperatures and clock speeds this card can achieve while drawing 800 watts.
That’s an unattractive design.
I fully expected the design to be a tie-in with the Tron: Ares movie.
Stunning card.
Is this real?
Is Asus trying to make the ugliest and most overpriced cards this generation?
That forced a double take. Are we back in the ATi days?
And the red and black color scheme is so old-school.
Did you pay $5,000 for an RTX 5090?
If I have disposable income, then my purchase isn’t foolish.
The image shows a product listing for the ROG Matrix GeForce RTX 5090.
Based on the image, this appears to be a render or concept, not an official product. The design is reminiscent of the previous ROG Matrix RTX 4090, but with a different shroud and fan configuration. I would wait for an official announcement from ASUS before taking this as a confirmed product.
The design of this RTX 5090 looks significantly worse than the 4090 Matrix.
This design reminds me of the HD 4870.
That’s why it looked so familiar.
That alone is enough to make me consider a second mortgage.
The video was removed. Was this a genuine leak or just a meme?
It appears to be real, though the production quantity is unknown. You can find more details by searching online.
You can trace this design lineage back to the HIS x1900xtx, X1950xtx, and hd2900.
I’m not a fan of the design.
I used to have a similar product, the 4870×2.
I wish they would stop wasting the RTX 5090 chip on this kind of product.
BTF is starting to interest me now.
Hopefully more manufacturers will release BFG components.
How much could I get for my lightly used base RTX 5090 to fund an upgrade?
The price is $2000.
Upgrading won’t provide an FPS boost if you’re already using an RTX 5090.
They do look amazing.
Now, regarding customer support if you encounter any issues.
It’s hard to tell if it’s gorgeous or hideous.
It appears to have a yo-yo attached to the end.
It resembles a cheap Chinese USB drive from the early 2000s.
How extravagant.
At what point will my GPU be powerful enough to power a small country just to get ten more frames in Minecraft?
It’s nice to see these cool designs, but I wish they offered some minimalist options as well.
Based on the 800W promo, it seems they might actually include that high-wattage BIOS. If so, it could perform as well as the RTX 6000, albeit while consuming more power. It would be a beast. On a side note, it’s quite unattractive.
The design is unattractive.
It has a head now, almost like a person.