My current television is an LG OLED65B6P, a 65-inch OLED model purchased new in 2016. It supports HDMI 2.0, 4K resolution at 60Hz, and has served me well for nearly nine years of gaming on my PS5 Pro and streaming movies and shows. While the TV still performs admirably, it does exhibit some moderate screen burn-in visible against certain red or beige backgrounds. More importantly, it lacks support for newer features like 4K at 120Hz, Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), which means I’m not fully utilizing the capabilities of my PS5 Pro.
I’m now considering an upgrade to a 77-inch OLED C5, which includes HDMI 2.1 support, 4K at 120Hz, ALLM, and VRR, and is currently available at a compelling price. However, I’m hesitant because HDMI 2.2 is rumored to launch next year, promising significant improvements such as support for 4K at 480Hz, with future consoles like the PS6 potentially leveraging these enhancements. This leaves me at a crossroads: do I invest in current technology and enjoy the immediate benefits, or wait for the next standard to future-proof my setup, especially given that my last purchase was quickly followed by the release of HDMI 2.1?
I’m in a similar boat with my 2017 OLED, and that mention of screen burn-in on red backgrounds really hit home—I see it on mine during sports broadcasts. The jump to 4K/120Hz and VRR for the PS5 is incredibly tempting, but I’m also holding off because of those HDMI 2.2 rumors; it feels like we’re on the cusp of another big leap. What’s your personal threshold for the new features versus the potential wait?
I totally get that hesitation, especially with the screen burn-in during sports—it’s a clear sign our older OLEDs are showing their age. My personal threshold was when the missing features, like 4K/120Hz and VRR, started limiting my PS5 experience enough to outweigh the “wait for the next big thing” feeling, since HDMI 2.2 is still speculative and current HDMI 2.1 already unlocks so much. One actionable step is to check if your favorite games or streaming apps would truly benefit from the higher frame rates and VRR, as that can make the upgrade feel more immediate. I’d love to hear what you decide—keep me posted on your upgrade journey!
Current models are at their lowest prices during Black Friday or holiday sales like Christmas and Boxing Day. If you keep waiting for the next best thing, you’ll miss out on enjoying gaming or movies now. When you feel the urge to upgrade, go ahead and make the purchase without regrets.
I appreciate the sentiment, but I prefer to make thoughtful decisions.
I’d prefer to wait, but prices for an 83″ OLED will likely become unaffordable once the new minor updates are released. Features like Dolby Vision 2, HDMI 2.2, and stutter fixes are appealing, but I can’t wait indefinitely.
I might have to pull the trigger now.
If your main reason for upgrading is size, go with the 83-inch model. If it’s not in your budget this year, wait for the G6 next year.
I’m upgrading primarily for better frame rates and gaming features like ALLM and VRR on my PS5 Pro. The 77″ size is ideal for my TV area, as 83″ would be too large.
Keep in mind that 4K resolution is equivalent to four 1080p screens combined, allowing you to sit closer to see all the details.
For those with excellent eyesight (100 PPD, a minority of people):
– 65”: 2.06m (6.76ft)
– 75”: 2.38m (7.81ft)
– 85”: 2.69m (8.83ft)
– 98”: 3.1m (10.17ft)
– 115”: 3.64m (11.94ft)
For average eyesight (20/20 vision, 60 PPD, most people):
– 65”: 1.14m (3.74ft)
– 75”: 1.32m (4.33ft)
– 85”: 1.5m (4.92ft)
– 98”: 1.72m (5.64ft)
– 115”: 2.02m (6.63ft)
I recommend calculating based on 100 PPD to be safe, especially if you have better than average eyesight. Do you know your exact viewing distance from the TV?
I sit about 8 to 9 feet away from my screen.
I would go with the larger size. The 77-inch model offers an 18% increase in diagonal size from 65 inches, while the 83-inch provides a 28% increase. At 8.5 feet, the 83-inch screen would also bring you closer to the recommended 40-degree viewing angle. You’ll be satisfied with your choice for much longer.
I recommend upgrading when you can afford it and are ready, rather than waiting for future models. Current TVs are in a mature state, while next year’s models could have issues that take time to resolve through updates. Pricing on current models is also favorable right now.
Regarding performance expectations, the PS6 won’t run modern games at 480fps in 4K—even a 5090 can’t achieve that. While 4K 240Hz is possible with HDMI 2.1 using DSC, this mainly applies to PC gaming. Consoles won’t reach such frame rates due to thermal and power constraints. The current PS5 struggles to maintain 120fps even at 1080p in most games.
HDMI 2.2 isn’t available in current TVs, despite earlier predictions. We’re not limited by HDMI 2.1 when using DSC, and future-proofing isn’t practical. Early HDMI 2.1 chipsets had issues with 4K/120Hz and VRR when transmitting lossless audio—Denon even had to provide customers with HDMI splitters to avoid dropouts. It’s better to avoid being an early adopter. I suggest sticking with HDMI 2.1 now to enjoy 144Hz or 165Hz, and consider HDMI 2.2 later when devices are available and any issues are resolved.
Thank you for your feedback. You’ve raised some excellent and valid points.
The 83-inch C5 is dimmer, just so you’re aware.
Given rising costs across the board, it’s worth noting that what was once considered a modest lifestyle is now harder to achieve. TV prices are likely to continue increasing. Manufacturers may phase out OLEDs like the OLED65B6P and price LCDs similarly while keeping higher profit margins.
True, but I think TV technology hasn’t seen any major advancements in the last couple of years. It’s been mostly steady, minor improvements so far.