GFX100RF vs Q3 Camera Comparison: Which One Should You Choose in 2025?
Let’s cut to the chase.
[→R] If you’re living abroad long-term, adore outdoor adventures, frequently shoot in high-altitude terrain, or demand uncompromising image quality for professional work—just grab the 100RF. Its high-resolution sensor delivers buttery-smooth color gradients, and the featherlight design is a game-changer.
As for the 28mm lens stabilization debate? Pure noise. Serious shooters know the leaf shutter handles vibrations effortlessly. By online logic, Leica M and Hasselblad 907 users should probably surrender their cameras altogether.
[→R] For China-based creatives wanting to elevate everyday moments into art, the Q3 shines. Its premium lens and Leica’s legendary color science (though not quite M-series magic) transform mundane scenes. That f/1.7 aperture slices through urban chaos—blurring out garish billboards, crowded streets, and tourist mobs with elegant simplicity.
Here’s the hard truth: social media has warped our priorities. We obsess over specs, invent phantom needs, and lose sight of what really matters. Years back, I shot an entire UK portfolio on a humble Fujifilm APS-C. Technically “flawed” by today’s standards, yet those landscapes and spontaneous moments still take my breath away. When you’re capturing true beauty, does f/4 versus f/2.8 actually matter? What you’re really chasing is poetry—the ability to frame soul-stirring horizons.
So who’s this compact medium-format camera for? Fujifilm’s official samples tell the whole story: it’s for seizing moments you’ll never want to forget. The Q series? Equally brilliant in its own right—flawless execution for the modern photographer. Choose what serves your vision. Aesthetics, after all, live in the eye of the beholder.
Pro tip: Fujifilm’s film simulations transform under pristine skies. When I revisit shots where sunlight actually looked like liquid gold, I realize some magic can’t be replicated. Same goes for DJI Hasselblad’s “Changsha, Hunan” color science—no profile can polish a Wuyi Square billboard into fine art. Gear should serve your subject, never the other way around.
Edward Grant 
Ada Stephens 
Bennett Schmidt
I’m leaning towards the GFX100RF for my landscape photography trips next year—it sounds like the image quality will be worth it. But I do wonder how the battery life compares between these two models since that’s always a痛点 for me when shooting outdoors.
I’m torn between these two because I love landscape photography but also need something compact for travel. The GFX100RF’s image quality sounds amazing, but the portability of the Q3 might win me over if I prioritize convenience. Guess it depends on whether I want to go full pro or keep things flexible.
You really can’t go wrong with either! If you’re leaning toward landscape photography, the GFX100RF’s image quality will help your landscapes stand out. But if travel flexibility is key, the Q3’s portability could be a game-changer. Personally, I think it depends on how you see your photography evolving—both options are solid choices! Thanks for sharing your dilemma—it’s a great question.
I’m torn between these two cameras because I do a lot of landscape photography but also need something compact for travel. The GFX100RF’s image quality sounds amazing, but the size and weight of the Q3 might win me over for more versatility on the go. I’d love to hear from someone who’s used both in the field.
I’m torn between these two because I love both landscape and street photography. The GFX100RF sounds amazing for landscapes with its resolution and color, but the Q3’s portability and versatility are tempting for urban shoots. Still not sure which one would fit my style better!
You really can’t go wrong with either! If you’re drawn to the stunning detail and color in landscapes, the GFX100RF will elevate your work. But if you find yourself needing a camera that’s just as at home on the streets as it is in the studio, the Q3’s versatility is hard to beat. Personally, I think it depends on whether you prioritize ultimate image quality or all-day adaptability—both are fantastic choices! Thanks for sharing your dilemma—it’s a great question.
I’m torn between these two because I do a lot of travel photography, but the GFX100RF’s image quality sounds hard to pass up. Still, the Q3 seems like it could be more versatile for different shooting situations, especially with that wide-angle lens. I’d love to hear from someone who’s used both in the field.
Absolutely, both cameras have their strengths! The GFX100RF truly shines with its incredible image quality and dynamic range, making it a dream for landscape and detailed shots during your travels. On the other hand, the Q3’s versatility, especially with its wide-angle options and compact size, is unbeatable for spontaneous adventures or tight spaces. If possible, try renting one of each to see which workflow feels right—personally, I lean toward the GFX100RF for its stunning results, but it depends on your style! Thanks for your thoughtful question.
I’m torn between these two cameras because I do a lot of landscape work but also need something portable for travel. The GFX100RF sounds amazing for my professional shots, but the Q3 might be more practical for everyday use due to its size and cost. It really depends on whether I prioritize ultimate image quality or budget-friendly versatility.
I’m torn between these two because while the GFX100RF sounds amazing for my professional work, I can’t ignore how compact and budget-friendly the Q3 is. For someone like me who shoots both landscapes and street photography, the 28mm lens on the Q3 is really tempting, but now I’m second-guessing if its stabilization will hold up.
I’m leaning towards the GFX100RF for my landscape photography trips next year—it sounds like the superior choice for sharp details and vibrant colors. But I do wonder how the battery life compares between these two models since that’s always been an issue for me in the past.
I totally agree that the GFX100RF is the clear winner for pros needing top-notch image quality, but I wonder how its size and price might intimidate hobbyists. The argument against the 28mm lens stabilization seems valid, though—it’s hard to beat that built-in leaf shutter performance. Still, I can see why someone might prefer the Q3 if they prioritize portability and budget. Great comparison overall!