Après avoir initialement acheté un PS5 standard avec lecteur de disque pour une somme surprenamment basse de 200 dollars, je suis resté déçu et l'ai finalement vendu avec un bénéfice, en pensant que j'attendrais simplement le PS6. Cependant, une opportunité s'est présentée lorsque j'ai découvert un PS5 Pro vendu à 400 dollars, qui comprenait un casque de 200 dollars : un bon marché que je n'ai pas pu ignorer.
Actuellement, j'ai un PS5 Slim installé dans mon salon, et bien que les jeux sur mon téléviseur 4K aient bonne allure, l'expérience visuelle ressemble davantage à celle d'un PS4.5 Pro qu'à un saut générationnel réel. À mon avis, la technologie de mise à l'échelle PSSR justifie le coût supplémentaire, offrant une mise à l'échelle 4K exceptionnelle qui fait une différence notable. Par exemple, jouer à *Flower* sur le Slim était impressionnant, mais le revisiter sur le Pro a été une révélation : cela ressemblait véritablement à une expérience native 4K, alors que la sortie du Slim ressemblait à du 1440p. Ce contraste m'a convaincu de passer totalement le PS6 de base et d'attendre plutôt un modèle Pro.
Why not take it a step further and wait for the PS9 Pro?
I’ll wait for quantum immortality and then get the last PlayStation ever made. How does that sound?
It appears they may have updated it, as it now clearly refers to both the slim and pro models.
Flower is what convinced you?
I don’t understand what’s wrong with these people.
You’ll only be waiting 7–10 more years for a PS6 Pro, if the world is still intact by then.
Would you say it’s worth it for someone with a standard 4K TV, without OLED or high refresh rate?
OLED isn’t essential, and there are many good TVs available. This subreddit sometimes makes it seem like OLED is a must for the PS5 Pro, but that’s not the case.
A well-calibrated panel is all you really need. If you can afford an OLED, go for it, but it’s not a necessity.
In fact, 120Hz has a greater impact than OLED, especially since many games offer a 40fps balanced mode where the real improvement is noticeable.
I completely agree, and it’s frustrating how often Mini-LED gets overlooked. The choice between OLED, Mini-LED, or even QLED should depend on your specific use case and budget. I wouldn’t call OLED overrated, but it does seem over-recommended in my opinion.
While some ray tracing benefits are clearly worthwhile, like AC Shadows RT GI at 60 fps, many users prefer balanced modes with VRR. For example, Spider-Man 2’s quality pro mode includes extra ray tracing at 30 fps, but with a VRR display, the experience becomes noticeably smoother at 40 fps. It really depends on the game and how developers implement these features. Dismissing the upgrade entirely is unreasonable—it comes down to your visual preferences.
I’ve used the Pro for months without an OLED or high refresh rate monitor and still found it worthwhile for the higher resolution and additional ray tracing. Now that I have an OLED display with VRR, the experience is even better. If I were you, I’d get the Pro first and save up for an OLED TV or monitor later.
I have a Black Friday TV that I got for $125, and it performs impressively. It maintains a solid 60fps with no loading screens or performance issues.
Playing Stellar Blade and Horizon Remastered on the PS5 Pro, I was blown away by the quality.
I’m really enjoying Stellar Blade. The Last of Us 1 and 2 were completed with intense dedication. I’ll likely play Cyberpunk next since I purchased the DLC.
Many people seem to overlook the value of the standard PS5 when discussing the PS5 Pro.
I agree. The original poster’s take seems a bit unreasonable.