Review

Xboxs 1000-Euro-Next-Gen-Leistungskonsole

  • Updated January 7, 2026
  • Kevin Dean
  • 445 comments

Stellen Sie sich vor, Microsoft stellt eine nächste Generation Xbox vor, die rein ein Konsolensystem ist, aber äußerst leistungsstark ist und für 999 Dollar verkauft wird. Dieses Premium-System würde mindestens doppelt so viel Leistung wie die PS6 liefern und sicherstellen, dass jedes Spiel deutlich besser läuft als auf konkurrierender Hardware. Obwohl es keine exklusiven Titel haben würde, macht seine enorme Leistung und zukunftssichere Gestaltung es zu einer attraktiven Option für alle, die topmoderne Gaming-Leistung suchen. Würde solch eine Konsole Ihr Interesse wecken?

Choose a language:

445 Comments

  2. Als leidenschaftlicher Gamer, der schon die Xbox Series X besitzt, würde mich eine 1000-Euro-Konsole wirklich reizen – besonders die Idee, dass sie doppelt so stark wie die PS6 sein soll. Allerdings frage ich mich, ob der Preis gerechtfertigt ist, wenn es keine exklusiven Spiele gibt. Würdet ihr so viel Geld für reine Leistung ausgeben, ohne zusätzliche Inhalte?

    1. Deine Begeisterung für die Xbox Series X und die Neugier auf eine noch leistungsstärkere Konsole teile ich absolut – besonders die Vorstellung, doppelte PS6-Leistung für 1000 Euro zu erhalten. Auch ohne Exklusivtitles rechtfertigt die Zukunftssicherheit und der Performance-Vorsprung den Preis, wenn dir flüssiges 8K-Gaming oder Raytracing in 120 FPS wichtig sind. Vergleiche doch vor einem Kauf Testberichte, sobald erste Hands-on-Reviews erscheinen, und berichte uns, ob dich die Technik überzeugt hat!

  5. They can’t do that because the specs were already leaked, and the design is likely finalized or will be by this fall. Since both Sony and Microsoft develop their consoles simultaneously, each has a good idea of what the other’s next-generation systems will include.

    I understand you were posing a hypothetical to gauge interest, but it’s too late in the process for next-gen consoles anyway.

  6. No, unless Xbox miraculously creates the most groundbreaking console of the next generation, I won’t be getting one. PC offers a better overall experience, so that will be my next gaming platform once I can afford to set up a rig.

  8. I would only consider buying it if they released around 30 exclusive games at launch. Even a couple of exclusives within the first year wouldn’t be enough, given their history of limited game availability at and after launch. Since I already own a PlayStation and a Switch, it would need to be truly compelling for me to invest. I value exclusives because they drive competition and push for higher quality. If they could return to the standards of the original Xbox and Xbox 360 eras, with must-have launch titles unavailable elsewhere, then I’d be on board.

  10. No, I already have a good PC, and Microsoft’s behavior this generation gives me no confidence that they’ll properly support any hardware they release. It feels like SEGA all over again.

  14. No, I don’t believe it will be a console in the traditional sense. It will likely resemble the ROG Ally X more closely. Microsoft has seen fans pay $1,000 for an Xbox-branded handheld PC, so their next “console” could simply be an outsourced PC tower running full Windows with an Xbox interface and launcher. It would be marked up for profit, possibly by the mandated 30%.

    If that happens, the user experience would be closer to PC gaming than console gaming, similar to the Ally X.

  15. My main concern is whether my entire game library will carry over to the next generation and if I can play offline, or if a constant internet connection is required. If the library transfers and internet is only needed for initial setup, then I would definitely buy it.

  16. No, I wouldn’t be interested. A console twice as powerful as the next PlayStation would cost far more than twice as much to produce, so Microsoft would have to take a major loss to sell it for $1,000—something they’re unlikely to do. But even if they did, power isn’t why I buy consoles. I choose them for their convenience and affordability. If consoles stop being convenient or affordable, I’ll just buy a PC instead.

  18. No, what does “twice the performance” even mean? Games already run great for the most part. The limiting factor isn’t the hardware but the developers. How many games have pushed graphics development this generation? Most don’t look noticeably better than last generation—Battlefront 2 comes to mind, and that’s largely due to using powerful engines like CryEngine or Frostbite.

    Loading times haven’t been an issue in years. There just isn’t enough improvement on the hardware side to drastically change my experience. I already have a laptop that handles most mid-tier games not available on Xbox. PlayStation exclusives are far better. I’ll keep my Series X to play my old games, or eventually emulate them once it dies. Consoles are supposed to be affordable and convenient compared to PC, but I can’t justify that price. Microsoft’s decisions don’t inspire confidence, especially now that Game Pass no longer feels worth it—it costs half the price of a new game, and most games I want aren’t on it because they’d lose money unless they need visibility.

  20. I can’t see it being a $1,000+ console unless it’s some sort of hybrid PC with multiple storefronts. The latter would likely drive the price up, as Microsoft probably wouldn’t be willing to take a loss without full control over software sales. I’m not sure what the selling point would be otherwise.

  21. The Series X disc edition will likely be my last console. In my opinion, gaming consoles are increasingly resembling personalized computers with each new generation. Unless Xbox or another company releases something truly unique for consoles, I plan to stick with my Series X and PC and see what develops in the coming years.

  24. My main concerns are the recent layoffs, the fact that the Xbox experience on the ROG Ally 2 is just an updated Xbox app, and that games often run better on Linux even without native support.

    Given the current state of Windows, it’s difficult to trust that they can deliver a great hybrid PC-console experience. I’m interested to see how they address this, and I suspect they might launch Windows 12 with a focus on being lightweight, especially in a console mode.

  28. No, this will be my last Xbox. In your scenario, PS6 games would still run better because developers would optimize for the PS6 rather than a $1,000 Xbox that few people own.

  29. No, I wouldn’t buy it. The Series X was sold on the promise of 60fps being the standard for all games, but it couldn’t even deliver that on first-party titles. I don’t trust their performance promises anymore.

    Without that trust, all that’s left is the content, which would likely be less than what the PS6 offers, probably at a lower cost.

  30. A console with twice the performance of the PS6 is unrealistic. The standard PS5 still holds up well after five years, performing similarly to a 3070.

    Keep in mind, the 3070 launched just one month before the PS5 and cost 500€—the same as the entire console. It’s unlikely Xbox would release a console with a 90-tier GPU for 1,000€.

    For example, AMD’s 9070 XT is already 600€, and a 90-tier GPU alone would easily exceed 1,000€. It’s just not feasible.

    That said, if such a console were released with double the power of the PS6 and functioned as a PC/console hybrid, I would definitely buy it—assuming Steam hasn’t released something similar by then.

  31. As a longtime Xbox owner with both a Series X and Series S, I’ve decided this will be my last Microsoft console. The rumors about a high-end next-gen system seem to be mostly speculation without solid backing from Microsoft, and I’ve lost confidence in their ability to deliver. If I continue with consoles, I’ll likely switch to the PS6, or I may just invest in a gaming PC instead.

    1. As a longtime Xbox user with over 21 years of loyalty and multiple consoles per generation, this will be my last. Microsoft’s recent decisions—studio closures, game cancellations, repeated price increases, and inconsistent first-party launches—have led me to this conclusion.

      2. I remember buying Unreal Tournament—or maybe it was Championship—and MechAssault on their release days. It’s a bit sad, but now in my mid-40s, with work and a child keeping me busy, gaming just isn’t as important to me as it used to be.

    2. I switched from a PS4 and Xbox One X to a PC and haven’t looked back. It’s a better investment because you can use it for more than just gaming and watching YouTube, like boosting productivity.

    3. I share this perspective. I currently own both a Series X and a Series S, but I plan to sell the Series X and purchase a PS5 instead. I’ll keep the Series S to maintain access to my digital library, but it will be my last Xbox console.

      1. The Series X is an excellent console and arguably the best on the market, but it lacks a strong library of exclusive games. While that doesn’t bother me personally, I’m concerned about Xbox’s overall direction. I originally bought my Xbox primarily for Halo, and now that PlayStation and soon Nintendo may have access to it, I feel somewhat let down. Xbox needs to do a better job of highlighting the Series X’s strengths.

  34. I would buy it because I don’t have a PC, only a Steam Deck, and I have a large library of games across Steam, GOG, Epic, and Xbox. As long as it can play all of them out of the box, I’m in.

  36. Yes, I would buy it. I believe in Microsoft and the Xbox brand, and they have the resources to deliver a powerful next-generation console. I hope they outperform Sony, and even if the device is more like a PC than a traditional Xbox, I can imagine Sony wouldn’t be happy about that.

  38. Probably not at that price, especially if you already have a good PC. That said, I do love my Series X, and I hope the next one will be around the current Series X price point.

    2. Factoring in the cost of Game Pass to play online, you’d spend over $2,000 over a typical 7-year console life cycle. At that price, consoles are no longer worth it.

      1. As a companion device, it’s useful for Play Anywhere titles, Xbox/Windows Store purchases, and backward compatibility. However, if you already have a capable PC, there’s little reason to buy modern multiplatform games on a console—especially those requiring online subscriptions—when your PC can handle them all with any peripherals you prefer.

  40. I initially bought the Series X because it was marketed as the most powerful console, with more under the hood than the PS5. However, two years later, I switched to the PS5 and now think I should have chosen it from the start. Xbox can pack in all the processing power they want, but without compelling exclusive games, the PS5 is generally the better option for most people. The only game I’ve played that ran better on the Series X was Elden Ring.

    Raw power doesn’t guarantee better performance—it ultimately depends on how well a game is developed, optimized, and supported.

    There are other factors to consider as well. Xbox controllers feel cheaply made, while the PS5 controller is more robust and durable. Although it has drift issues, the buttons don’t fall off, the bumpers don’t break, the battery lasts longer, the audio connection is better, and the touchpad is a great feature.

    The PS5’s user interface is more intuitive, offering deeper customization and useful shortcuts. Settings carry over between games, so you don’t have to repeatedly adjust HDR and performance modes for each title.

    Microsoft does have some good exclusives, but Sony’s studios are in a different league. Games like Horizon, God of War, and The Last of Us have a consistent quality that sets them apart. This quality extends to other Sony products as well—from TVs to music players—reflecting their commitment to reliability.

    So, no, I wouldn’t buy a next-gen Xbox unless Microsoft does something truly exceptional or Sony makes a major misstep.

    1. I have to disagree about the hardware quality. The Series X is superior—it’s a jewel, and the controller is still excellent. Regarding exclusives, you’re referring to the past, like the PS4 era. This generation, I’ve seen far more variety on Xbox.

      1. That’s a good point about PlayStation’s exclusive games; I hadn’t considered that perspective. However, the Xbox controllers feel cheap with their clicky, plastic-on-plastic design, and they break frequently. I went through so many that I started combining parts from several broken ones to make a working controller instead of constantly buying replacements. It’s a shame because ergonomically, they’re superior.

        On PlayStation 5, I encounter far fewer issues like error messages, connectivity prompts, login requirements, or unresponsive menus that require a reset. For these reasons, I believe the PS5 is the more reliable device and has a better user interface.

        I want to clarify that I used Xbox for nearly 20 years and don’t dislike the brand, but I feel PlayStation offers a better overall package.

        Additionally, PlayStation Plus Extra costs less than Game Pass Standard and includes most premium benefits except cloud streaming. With Game Pass prices increasing significantly, switching to PlayStation made even more sense for me.

        1. My main concern is that the high price will alienate the average console gamer, and developers will focus on the player base. If Xbox doesn’t fully commit to being either a console or a PC with full Steam access, it won’t compete with PlayStation’s affordability, and fans may feel betrayed. It also won’t significantly draw people away from PCs beyond novelty. If Xbox can’t match the popularity of other systems, lower-budget games may not be well-supported, leaving buyers disappointed with their investment. Trying to bridge the gap between console and PC is a big risk, and while I hope it benefits the gaming community, it feels like a pointless cash grab that betrays Xbox’s legacy as an attainable powerhouse. Now it’s less accessible than a future PS6 might be, and for similar or slightly more money, people could get a desktop that outperforms it in hardware. Ultimately, it seems alienating and unnecessary.

  41. A $1,000 console is a tough sell when history shows that superior specs don’t guarantee success. The PS3, Xbox One, and Series X all demonstrated that having better games at a more affordable price often matters more.

  42. No chance. For a few hundred more, you could build a solid PC. Paying $1000 for a console is unreasonable, and anyone who does is just blindly loyal to their preferred brand.

  44. No, $1,000 is too expensive for a console. Sony learned that lesson in 2006.

    Sony will likely come out strong with the PlayStation 6, showcasing amazing-looking games and masterful first-party exclusives. They’re known for creating 10/10 games in-house, without buying studios late in development and claiming games as their own.

    They might price it at $549, or $749 bundled with a few games, a headset, and extra storage.

    Meanwhile, Xbox offers a $1,000 box with no standout titles. When asked for them, they’ll likely just say, “Enjoy hundreds of titles on GamePass.”

    So, you’d pay $1,000 to play side-scroller indie games? No thanks—you can keep it.

  45. I switched to PC after the Xbox One launch because Microsoft claimed it was incredibly powerful, yet Battlefield 4 ran at 900p and 30fps. It couldn’t even match Call of Duty, which was already at 1080p and 60fps.

    The current generation has similar issues with 4K and variable refresh rate promises. Many demanding games run at medium settings with dynamic resolution just to maintain 60fps, or even 30fps in some cases.

    I can’t imagine playing games at 30fps in 2025. I’ll never go back to using a console as my primary platform.

  47. For a console priced over $1000, it would need to offer a significant leap for consumers. If Microsoft releases another powerful console without compelling games or access to platforms like Steam, it would be the first Xbox I skip. In that case, I’d likely opt for a PS6 and perhaps a Switch 2 once it becomes more affordable.

  48. Considering people are already spending over $1,300 on PC handhelds with laptop-level APUs, a $1,000 desktop-class console with Steam access seems feasible in today’s market.

  49. No, I wouldn’t buy it. At this point, if it were just an Xbox console for $1000, there’s no reason to own one since all games are coming to PlayStation and PC.

  53. It won’t deliver double the performance, as games don’t scale that way. While it will have a better CPU and GPU, PC ports are often poorly optimized—many say nine out of ten are bad—so few games will actually take advantage of the difference. The main benefit will be more graphics options on PC, making it easier to improve visuals with less RAM or boost frame rates by lowering settings. The most significant factor will be VRAM, which will only be slightly larger on the Xbox.

  56. I don’t need graphics better than the Xbox Series X. I just want more good games for the current console and less unnecessary issues. Game Pass was worthwhile when it was reasonably priced, but that’s no longer the case. I’ll simply buy the best games from this generation on sale and enjoy them over the next several years.

  58. I might consider it, since I prefer the Xbox UI and controller. It’s surprising to say Microsoft has the best interface, but their menus are more intuitive to me.

  59. I plan to upgrade within a year or two of the console’s release, but not on day one. I’ll wait for a discount or a solid deal, and for any major quality concerns to be resolved first, as I do with most games I play.

  61. I don’t see much reason to invest in the hardware anymore since I don’t have a digital back catalog, and Xbox exclusives tend to end up elsewhere. The 360 was my reintroduction to gaming, but I feel the brand now lacks a clear identity and compelling reasons to keep buying their hardware.

  62. As someone who has owned every Xbox generation, I would likely buy a $1,000 high-performance console. I’ve been satisfied with this generation and don’t understand the widespread pessimism about Xbox.

  67. This is exactly what happened with the Series X. Remember the discussions about teraflops? Just because it’s powerful doesn’t mean it will run games better. The Series X has better hardware than the PS5, but most games aren’t optimized to use it, so the PS5 often performs better.

  69. I would buy it because I don’t own a gaming PC. While I could build one, it’s easier to pay $1,000 for a console that will last a long time with minimal maintenance compared to a PC. A high-end PC would cost significantly more than that, plus I could easily connect to my TV and already have a large Xbox library. It’s an easy decision for me.

    However, if the rumors about it including Steam aren’t true, I might reconsider. In that case, I’d rather spend the extra money to build a PC or opt for a Steam Machine for my Steam titles, depending on its price.

  71. A $1,000 proprietary system isn’t worth it when you’ll end up paying more for accessories and extra storage. You’re better off with a PC, especially since you can still use Game Pass and access all the same games. A PC offers more power, flexibility, and the ability to upgrade components like the CPU or GPU—something you can’t do with a console, which tends to fall behind quickly in performance. Ultimately, it’s your money and your choice, but building a PC yourself isn’t difficult and gives you more value for your money.

  74. Yes. I’m not a fan of Sony’s controllers, and most of their games don’t appeal to me. I’m also too invested in Xbox’s ecosystem to switch. A $1,000 premium console that also supports Steam and other storefronts sounds amazing. I have no interest in PC gaming as it is.

  76. I would definitely buy it. I hope it’s a true powerhouse, but the price doesn’t really matter to me. I’ve been very satisfied with my Series X—it’s been a great and convenient console. I’ve owned every Xbox since the original.

  82. No, why choose this and be limited to Xbox’s library when you could get a PC and access so much more, including emulators? It’s like buying an iPad Pro instead of a MacBook Pro for the same price—why restrict yourself?

  83. Yes, I would. I’ve been saving to upgrade my PC, but I’d put that on hold for this. A $1,000 prebuilt system that can run all games, switch easily between TV and monitor, and performs better than my 3060 build is a fair price—provided it runs PC games without issue.

  87. Forward compatibility with enhancements is the most appealing aspect for me. Since I have a large backlog, it would be great if games I play on the next Xbox run at higher frame rates and resolutions.

    For example, I missed Dead Space 3 on the 360 and recently played it on the Series S. The 60fps mode and improved resolution made a noticeable difference.

  92. I wouldn’t spend that much on a console regardless of its power. They haven’t made significant use of the power available in this generation, so I’ll stick with my Series X and Switch. Both have plenty of games to keep me occupied for a long time.

  95. No, I wouldn’t buy it for gaming. At $299, I’d consider it, but $1,000 for a console that will be outdated in a few years, plus $80 games? I’d rather spend time playing simpler games with friends.

  97. My friends and I were discussing in Xbox party chat that at this point, we might as well get a gaming PC. Why pay $1,200 for an Xbox when you could get a low- to mid-range PC for the same price and still have the option to upgrade it later?

  98. I’m not buying any consoles until Trump leaves office. These tariffs need to be adjusted. I already have two Series X consoles, a PS5, and a PS5 Pro, so I’m set for now.

  102. Absolutely not. That would be an unreasonable price, especially considering what we know about the PS6. While the PS6 may be less powerful, it won’t be significantly weaker, and it will likely be hundreds of dollars cheaper with a stronger game library. I’d also be concerned about third-party support if Microsoft released another traditional Xbox, as it’s already somewhat uncertain on the Series X.

    Fortunately, Microsoft hasn’t lost touch with reality and is moving forward with the hybrid console. I’m quite interested in that and fairly likely to buy one if it’s executed well.

  103. I would consider buying the next Xbox if it includes Steam integration and offers good value for its specs. However, if it’s a $1000 premium console as described, I’d likely opt for a PS6 instead. Despite Microsoft’s claims, exclusive games remain an important factor.

  106. I plan to buy the next-gen Xbox regardless of its features or price, and I’ll wait for the PS6 Pro. I have extensive libraries on both platforms.

    However, if the Xbox is a PC hybrid that can play PlayStation games through Steam, I might not need the PS6 Pro. My PS5 Pro already handles my entire PlayStation library.

  107. No, I honestly regret buying and supporting Xbox since the Xbox One, and this doesn’t change that. In my opinion, they should stop making hardware and focus entirely on publishing for other platforms.

  108. No, it’s becoming too disheartening to continue supporting Xbox. I know I shouldn’t get emotional about this, but I do, so I’m stepping back by retiring it. I’ll just keep using my XSX for as long as it lasts.

  114. I would still prefer a hybrid console. While I might be interested, a $1,000 console is doomed from the start. Niche products don’t get much support from partners, whereas a hybrid console can play virtually any game.

  115. Probably not. What advantages would the games offer compared to the PS6? Developers might just release the PS6 version on Xbox for simplicity, even if the hardware is more powerful.

    It also took time for developers to fully utilize the X/S and PS5 capabilities. In this case, I’d wait for a sale or a price drop, even though we haven’t seen significant price reductions for the X/S or PS5.

  116. No, I would be content with the power level of a PS6, just as I am with my PS5 and XSX compared to my PC. Most games offer performance or balanced modes, which is enough for me. Coming from a generation where many 3D games ran poorly but were still enjoyable, I think games already look great. I wouldn’t spend that much just to play the same game at a higher resolution and miss out on exclusives. I’m going where the games are. It’s been a great ride, Xbox, but $1000 for a console is an absolute no.

  118. No, at this point you’re better off getting a PC and buying games from Steam or GOG. Let a company that prioritizes profit-driven hardware and marketing intellectual property over actual games exit the marketplace. I doubt they’ll even maintain backward compatibility moving forward, which was a major reason I bought an Xbox in the first place.

  119. No, I’m not impressed with the current state of PC technology. There’s a lot of raw power, but it’s often held back by bottlenecks. For this to be worthwhile, Microsoft would need to revolutionize game development, similar to what Sony has done with their exclusives. Unfortunately, Microsoft will probably stick to the PC spec model, offering poorly optimized games that are limited by the need to run on low-end hardware.

  124. Given their track record, both options seem like a misstep. A $700–800 basic console would likely be dead on arrival, since there’s little reason to choose it. Alternatively, a $1,199 Asus Xbox desktop that can play Sony titles on PC would be a tough sell due to the high price and lack of plug-and-play convenience.

  125. PlayStation has also let down their customers. I don’t understand some of these comments acting like only Microsoft does this. Both companies have repeatedly disappointed their fans. So what if their games are playable on PlayStation? If this next-gen console is real, it could play both Xbox and PlayStation games.

  128. For me, the biggest issue isn’t the price—it’s Windows.

    Microsoft has only truly excelled in gaming when Windows wasn’t involved, as with the Xbox console. Now we’re moving away from that and expecting Microsoft to make Windows a great platform for gaming.

    But over the past 25 years, Windows has consistently been the weakest link in PC gaming. Windows 11 is unreliable, Games for Windows Live was a disaster, and nothing has worked seamlessly since the days of Windows 95.

    To think Microsoft will suddenly make Windows fantastic for gaming is unrealistic.

  129. I’m not considering the features you mentioned because they aren’t the selling point for me. I’m less concerned with raw power and more with the game selection, which I feel has been lacking for Xbox. Since it’s not a hybrid system that allows me to play all Xbox titles and games from other storefronts, I’d rather wait for a PS6. I bought the Series X at launch and have been consistently disappointed with the game lineup. Xbox often gets overlooked by developers and loses out due to exclusivity deals. If I could go back, I would have chosen the PS5 instead.

  131. People don’t realize that you’d only want Steam on it, so the next Xbox’s success would depend entirely on a third-party store. This won’t end well for Xbox, as a third-party store doesn’t generate revenue for them. Nobody will buy games separately when Game Pass is available.

  136. Without exclusives, an overpriced Game Pass, and a console that’s essentially a weak PC, I don’t see a reason to buy this unless you’re interested in PC gaming but can’t afford a proper PC.

  139. Pricing it at $1,000 would alienate consumers. With inflation driving prices up, people are already hesitant to buy Xbox consoles as it is.

    While we have 32GB of VRAM, is that really necessary for consoles?

    Has there been a noticeable improvement in graphics from the Xbox One to the Series X? It seems more like developers are just adding more clutter to the screen, taking advantage of the SSDs’ capabilities.

  146. I’d consider it if it delivers a premium experience. The original Xbox was fantastic—I loved blowing up everything in Bloodwake while listening to Korn. Those were good times.

  147. No, I suspect this will be the last Xbox I own for at least a generation. I’m in the process of switching to the Switch 2 as my primary system, and I’m comfortable with that decision.

    They’ve simply priced their hardware beyond my interest. My GamerScore matters much less to me now than it did even a month ago, and Xbox Rewards might as well be irrelevant.

    Honestly, I could spend a little more than $1,000 and get a full PC with far more utility and purpose than sticking with a system that’s primarily for gaming.

  150. Exclusive, high-quality games matter far more than teraflops. After how poorly this generation has been handled, there’s no reason to buy an Xbox again. I enjoy my Series X and S, but they deserved much better.

  151. No, I have no interest in buying a poor man’s gaming PC. I want a console to be a console, and I’ll use my gaming PC for PC gaming. The less Microsoft is involved, the better. As soon as I can get off Windows, I will, since it’s terrible these days.

    1. I wish Valve would release another Steam Box. While it would likely sell in limited numbers compared to Xbox or PlayStation, they have the resources to make it happen just for the sake of it. It might even exceed expectations by appealing to those who prefer a straightforward, no-frills gaming experience.

  153. At this point in my gaming hobby, chasing higher visual clarity feels like a race to the bottom, where I’m just looking for flaws. I’d rather have a genuinely fun game with strong art direction that enhances the experience. I increasingly believe my next Switch will offer more than either competitor.

  154. Of course, because many people simply want the best way to play. Both consoles will likely be over $700 or $800. If Xbox includes PC compatibility, it would definitely be worth it, but the PlayStation handheld looks promising too.

  155. I wouldn’t buy it. Being locked into a console ecosystem at that price is unreasonable, especially when they no longer properly support physical media. You’re better off spending that money on a PC or an upgrade if you already have one. You’ll get the advantages of an open platform with cheaper games, better performance, and greater flexibility for other uses.

  157. No, if I’m spending $1,000, I’d rather put it toward a PC that offers more features and usability. You can build a capable system for $1,000 to $1,500 without being locked into a proprietary setup that can’t be upgraded later. In my opinion, Xbox would be digging its own grave with this approach. Even if the console is worth the price, most consumers aren’t willing to spend that much on a gaming system.

  158. No, the Series X was supposed to be a powerhouse that could outperform the PS5 and others, but the Series S held it back. The next console would likely just run multiplatform games at their highest settings, with the same core game structure as this generation.

  160. I don’t see myself getting a next-gen console. I’d need to see how it performs before even considering it, and the same goes for the PS6. At $1,000, I’d have to seriously think about spending that much on a gaming console. For that price, you could easily switch to PC instead.

  163. The Xbox 360 Pro Edition launched at $400 in 2005, which would be about $650 today after inflation. So, no. People buy consoles because they’re an affordable and simple way to play games.

  164. Yes. I don’t enjoy using my laptop for gaming, and while I’m not wealthy, I’ll buy it. I like the concept, and it will likely provide a comfortable gaming experience for the next decade or so.

  166. As an owner of every Xbox since the original, I also started collecting PlayStations with the PS4. In my view, the PS5 is a better machine than the Xbox Series X due to its more user-friendly interface, and I don’t notice any significant power difference between them. While I like the XSX, having to physically pair the controllers feels outdated, and occasional unpairing issues are frustrating. In contrast, PS5 controllers just work. Microsoft also comes across as more profit-driven, especially after the recent Game Pass price hike, while Sony has enhanced PlayStation Plus benefits. The PS5 receives frequent, seamless software updates, whereas Xbox OS updates seem rare. Although I enjoy both consoles, I prefer the PS5 and wouldn’t spend $1,000 on another Xbox—I only bought the Series X for Microsoft Flight Simulator. As for PC gaming, since I work at a computer all day, I’d rather relax in my recliner with a console.

  171. No, I don’t have anything against Xbox, but my Series X and S are just collecting dust. While it’s not a bad console, their games just aren’t as exciting as they used to be.

  174. No, because it’s still about the games. I prefer Japanese-developed games, and they aren’t guaranteed to be available on Xbox, or at least not at the same time as on other platforms.

  175. No, I wouldn’t buy it. The Xbox games I’m interested in are either available on other platforms or have no chance of getting a new installment soon. Even if they handed the series to another company, it’s unlikely since it’s been untouched beyond backwards compatibility for longer than I’ve been alive.

  176. Yes, as long as it offers better performance, I’m happy. I play a few multiplayer games and could use every advantage I can get. I don’t want to build a PC—it’s too much work.

  177. Some enthusiasts might be interested, but at that price, they’d be better off with a PC. There may be limited interest from dedicated Xbox fans, but a $1,000 console would sell very poorly.

  183. If it supports my current library with backward compatibility and offers enhancements like the Xbox One X did, I would consider it. That’s what convinced me to buy both the One X and Series X.

    If Microsoft commits to developing and maintaining a robust emulator capable of running any Xbox disc, they could justify a higher price.

    If it features a streamlined, bloat-free Windows OS that allows me to install my preferred emulators, stores, and games with full controller support, that would be acceptable.

    However, if it relies solely on xCloud streaming and subscription access, I’m not interested.

  184. I’d consider the $1000 price if it’s a quality product. However, if it’s essentially a PC with an Xbox logo, I’d rather build my own PC and run Bazzite or a similar alternative—assuming anti-cheat issues are resolved by then. I’m not particularly fond of Windows these days.

  186. Probably not. I’m on my second Series X after nearly leaving Xbox when my first one arrived broken. Microsoft and Target both refused to honor the warranty, and the console couldn’t play most games without crashing or blue-screening. With the loss of exclusives, rising prices, and terrible customer support, I have no interest in supporting them further. Unless the next Xbox can print money or make me incredibly attractive, I’ll likely switch to PS6 or stick with my PC.

  189. I would buy it. As a dedicated console gamer who can afford the cost, an extra $300–400 is still far cheaper than building a new gaming PC.

    However, many gamers already complain about $70 games—a mere $10 increase. Most likely can’t handle a $300–400 price jump. Microsoft and Sony know their audience and set prices accordingly. That’s why each console generation improves but still lags behind PC technology.

  192. Yes, but I have adult money and no kids. I’ve considered getting into PC gaming, and with a hybrid system, I could keep my existing library while accessing even more games from different storefronts.

    I’m likely part of the target audience they’ll market to. For others, though, I agree it would be a tough sell.

  195. Yes, I would buy it, especially if it includes a mid-to-high end 4K player. I appreciate the picture quality from my Panasonic UB820, but the Series X excels in every other aspect—speed, user interface, menus, and controller.

  200. No, nobody wants that. The Series X is more powerful than the PS5, but nobody cares and developers don’t cater to it since the lead platform is the PS5.

    The next Xbox won’t sell many units.

    The only reason people recommended an Xbox was for Game Pass, but now it’s priced out of the casual market.

  202. It depends on whether it outperforms a gaming PC at the same price. Gaming PCs can get quite expensive, especially if you want features like ray tracing, which often pushes the cost well over $1,000. So, if this Xbox is significantly more powerful—say, twice as capable as a future PS6—it could be a good deal. I haven’t upgraded my PC because I’d have to spend a lot just to match what my current Xbox already does, let alone a much more powerful console. PCs do offer more, but at a much higher price; a $2,000–$3,000 PC should easily outperform any console.

  204. Based on the last two generations, no. I’ve been with Xbox since before the first generation, even providing feedback pre-launch, but this generation has been underwhelming. Despite billions invested in studios, it relies too heavily on third-party support.

    The shift toward Everything as a Service doesn’t work for me. I prefer offline play and local co-op, which are increasingly unsupported.

    I already own a high-end PC, so spending another $1,000–$1,200 on an Xbox that won’t outperform it doesn’t make sense.

    It also seems like the end for my favorite first-party franchise, Forza Motorsport, given the layoffs and sidelining of Turn 10, despite it being a billion-dollar brand.

    Additionally, I’m appalled by Microsoft’s partnership with Israel, providing AI and cloud services used in surveillance and violence against Palestinians, including children and starving families. This doesn’t deserve anyone’s support.

    I’m happier spending my money with Sony and Nintendo for their high-quality exclusives, solid living room experiences, and well-supported creative studios.

    I’ve been multiplatform for decades, but this is the first time I feel Microsoft has lost its way in gaming and basic decency toward its fans and the world.

  207. If it allows me to build a PC that can record all my Steam games and my Xbox library, and if I can play online without a subscription, then yes. I could build a more affordable PC than originally planned and upgrade it gradually as prices improve.

  209. No, my entire digital library is split between PlayStation (mostly), Steam, and Epic. Unless I can play my PlayStation games on it, I’m not interested.

    Xbox made a critical mistake during the Xbox One and PS4 generation. That was an essential time to compete, as that’s when most gamers were building their game libraries.

  210. While I can afford both consoles and appreciate Microsoft’s services, many people can only buy one. For them, having access to all PlayStation exclusives is a significant advantage, even if they’re not initially interested in most of them. The option to play those games later is worth considering.

  211. No, and a console like this would be far from “future proof.”

    One major issue is that developers would have to decide whether it’s worth their time and resources to make games for it. Since fewer people would buy a $1,000 console, it would be a niche product. Depending on how difficult the system is to develop for, many developers might choose not to support it. This was a challenge Stadia faced, though not its main problem.

    For consumers, there’s a potential $300–400 price difference to consider. I’ve owned a Series S and a PS5 for years and haven’t had any performance issues with either. Even if graphics never improved beyond this generation, I wouldn’t mind. My TV is capped at 30fps, so higher frame rates don’t matter to me most of the time.

    I understand I’m not the target audience for the next Xbox, and that’s fine. But at its current price, I don’t see anything that would convince me to buy it unless the PS6 were already priced at $800 or more.

  218. No, I see the business case for a high-end console, but it’s not for me. A $1,000 device likely won’t offer the same seamless experience as a traditional console, and the cost may rise further if they’re integrating both PC and console hardware. In that case, I’d probably opt for the next PlayStation or stick with my Switch 2 if I don’t feel the need for a stationary console for major releases. That said, I’ll be selling my Series X soon.

  219. If it includes a disc drive and actual physical games—not just key cards—then I would consider it. Otherwise, I’d opt for a better video card and play those games on PC.

  222. At nearly double the price of its competitor, all that power won’t matter much. Developers will likely focus on the PS6, which will probably be the more popular console again. While Xbox exclusives might look impressive, you reach a point of diminishing returns when pushing for high-end graphics relative to the price. At $1,000, you’ll price out most of your audience regardless of performance.

  223. Unfortunately, I won’t be buying it. This would be the first Xbox I’ve skipped since I switched to Sony a couple of years ago. For now, my PlayStation and Switch cover my gaming needs, though I’ll keep my older consoles and game collection for replaying favorites.

  224. At that price, the power doesn’t matter unless it’s a hybrid console. I’d only consider buying the next Xbox if it’s priced competitively with the PS6. If it were around $500 to $600, I’d probably purchase it.

  229. If the games are designed to take full advantage of the hardware, I would consider buying it. My issue with the Series X, for example, is that no games are developed specifically for its capabilities—they’re made to run on both the Series S and X. If this new console is truly a powerhouse and games are built for it, then sure. But if the games are just made to run on both the PS5 and the new Xbox, then it’s pointless.

  233. With about £400 in rewards points, I might consider it. I’m glad I’m not a PlayStation customer, as they don’t offer much in terms of rewards or games for dedicated gamers.

  234. No. Every Xbox has been marketed as the best, yet I still have to choose between visuals and performance in games. My PC doesn’t require that choice, and it can also play all the PlayStation games. Xbox consoles will become pointless if you already own a capable PC.

  235. Yes, I’d buy it to play GTA6, and it would still be cheaper than a gaming PC. I already have a solid Xbox library, and my income will be significantly higher by then, so it shouldn’t be a problem.

  236. If it could genuinely function as both a gaming PC and a console, I might consider it for the two-in-one value.

    As an Apple user, my only Windows device is a ROG Ally, which I occasionally connect to my work laptop dock—though it’s not an ideal setup.

    For $1,000, I could see myself as a hybrid user. However, I’m heavily invested in the PlayStation ecosystem as a trophy hunter, and switching to Xbox would mean leaving behind my trophies and software library. Realistically, I doubt I would make the change.

  243. I’ll buy it as soon as it’s available. While I already have a powerful PC, having a powerful console would be great too. I plan to give my Series X to my brother since he enjoys playing FIFA.

  244. It would need to support PC store games to be worth the price. Visual improvements are reaching a point of diminishing returns, but if it can play both Xbox and PC games on a TV, I’d be willing to pay that amount.

  245. If they allow access to other markets like Steam, how do they plan to make money from the console? The business model relies on selling the console at a lower cost to profit from games and accessories later. So, I think it will likely be expensive for its performance, similar to the Series X today or the ROG Ally.

  246. For me to consider a $1,000 next-gen Xbox, it would need to function like a gaming PC. That means full customization and the ability to upgrade components. Games should offer PC-level graphics settings with an optimization feature for your specific setup. It should also support TV connectivity and any controller, just like a PC. Essentially, it would be a gaming PC that can serve as a simple console for casual users, while also providing full access to Windows and software like Adobe for true PC functionality.

      1. If the next-gen Xbox is simply a high-end console without additional features, then no, I wouldn’t buy it for $1,000. At that price, I’d expect it to offer more than just gaming capabilities.

  252. Since I already have a laptop, I wouldn’t spend $1,000 on a console. However, if I were to spend that much, I’d choose a PlayStation because I trust its first-party games to be worthwhile. I bought my Xbox Series X not because I expected great exclusives, but because I owned around 400 Xbox One games and wanted to keep them. My PlayStation, on the other hand, was purchased specifically for its first-party titles. Now that I have a laptop, I don’t see a reason to buy another Xbox.

  253. For $1,000, it needs a compelling feature. Nintendo offers portability and motion controls, while a more PC-like Xbox could be a strong selling point. If it delivers on that promise, I would buy it at that price.

    1. The key factor will be performance and how it compares to the PS6.

      If it functions like a PC, it will appeal to hardcore gamers who want to play titles like Apex Legends at over 120 fps and adjust graphic settings.

      Given the popularity of sites like Digital Foundry, every game will likely be compared, with many concluding the best platform is Microsoft if there’s a significant performance advantage in every title.

      Microsoft also controls games like Call of Duty, allowing them to maximize the performance gap.

      1. I agree that it doesn’t need to be top-tier hardware. A solid midrange console with reliable performance and full backward compatibility for your Xbox library would be ideal. That backward compatibility would definitely appeal to many buyers.

        1. I don’t think that’s enough justification for me. I wouldn’t pay $1,000 for something comparable to a PS6 that has good exclusives. It would need to play every game significantly better to make it worthwhile.

          1. I didn’t say it would be comparable to the PS6—it will almost certainly outperform it. However, getting an ultra-high-end PC with custom Xbox silicon that also plays all Xbox console games for just $1,000 is a tall order. There will be trade-offs.

      2. The issue is that after about a year, a $1000 Xbox-branded PC becomes a poor value for hardcore gamers. It’s already outdated at launch and seems overpriced within 18 months. By mid-cycle, you can build a more powerful PC for much less money. Most dedicated gamers will already own a PC anyway.

  255. No, I wouldn’t. Microsoft has been the most inconsistent, misleading, and disappointing company this generation, so why support them further? Their exclusives are increasingly available on other platforms, which are delivering stellar titles of their own.

    I love many Xbox franchises like Halo, Gears, and State of Decay, but they’ve become shadows of what they once were, and most games are multiplatform now. You can play Xbox titles on other consoles, but the reverse isn’t true. To make matters worse, Game Pass is becoming less affordable.

  259. No, I wouldn’t. Exclusives are what drive a console’s success, not raw power. The Switch and its successor outperform the PS5 and Series X despite having significantly less power, simply because they offer better games.

  262. No, the price is too high. The system won’t be as popular as the PS6, so developers will prioritize optimizing for that platform. Even if the Xbox has better specs, it won’t make a significant difference in game performance.

  265. No, that’s too expensive, and it probably won’t have a disc drive.

    I’m perfectly happy with my Series X. It lets me play games from four generations and use my Blu-rays and physical game collection.

    Besides, the Xbox Series and PS5 generation will likely be supported for at least five more years into the next generation, just as they have been for many releases this time around.

  266. Probably not. Being top tier only requires a 1% performance advantage over competitors. If they’re charging 50% less for 99% of the performance, Xbox isn’t worth it.

  267. No, I wouldn’t buy it. A $1,000 console would be extremely niche and likely sell worse than the Wii U. Third-party support would disappear, and it would probably be discontinued within two years. Buying this would be a very expensive mistake—imagine if the Dreamcast had cost that much.

  268. I’ve come to realize over the years that consoles don’t meet my expectations. I get drawn in by the hype, but I always return to PC gaming. It’s more expensive, but there are fewer restrictions. I’m accustomed to running all my games at 90-120 FPS with high resolution.

  269. Absolutely. The only place I could set up a PC in my home is at the dining room table, and I don’t want to do that. For me, being able to play Steam games and access my Xbox library is a dream. Sure, the Steam games won’t have graphics as good as on a PC, but I couldn’t care less. I have a 4K TV, so I’ll be fine.

  270. You’ve essentially described a gaming PC. Microsoft can’t subsidize their next console, which is a model that has repeatedly failed them and explains why they aren’t among the top two console leaders. The rumored Xbox is expected to cost around $1200–1400 USD and should outperform a similarly priced gaming PC, running Steam and Xbox games more efficiently with less OS interference and system bloat. This allows it to deliver better performance relative to its hardware, much like a console.

    The PS6 will likely be less powerful and more affordable, but Sony’s strong following means that won’t hinder its success. Currently, the main choice in gaming is between consoles for exclusives or a gaming PC for raw power and broader game options beyond a single platform store.

    We’ve reached a plateau in graphics with current technology, so minor hardware upgrades won’t make a big difference—instead, game titles will drive next-gen console sales. We already have 4K at 120fps with ray tracing, and there’s nothing significantly better available yet. The future of gaming seems to be in innovative ways to play, as seen with the Wii and Switch, and both PlayStation and Xbox may need to revisit that approach now that they’ve pushed graphical limits as far as they can.

  274. I don’t trust Microsoft to pull this off, and I don’t want a PC trapped in a console body. The fact that it would essentially be a non-upgradable PC makes it a no at any price.

  279. I’ve always wanted a console that bridges the gap with PC gaming, so I plan to buy the top-tier version as soon as it’s available. I’m already saving up for it.

  281. Given that the current console is approaching $800 and their handheld already costs $1,000, it’s unrealistic to expect the next Xbox to be $1,000 or less. At this rate of price increases, it will likely start at a minimum of $1,500.

  282. I wouldn’t buy it regardless of how powerful it might be. Microsoft is pushing harder than any competitor for an all-digital future, and removing exclusives is the final straw. While the other two are also moving toward digital, Microsoft is far more aggressive about it.

    At this point, I’d rather switch to a PC than support Xbox. I left Sony during the PS3 generation when they removed backward compatibility, and I won’t hesitate to do the same to Microsoft. If they insist on making poor decisions, they’ll face the consequences.

    For modern gaming, I’ll stick with PC, and for consoles, I’ll focus on retro gaming. Nintendo has never been my primary console, and with the Switch 2 reportedly using unlock keys instead of full games on cartridges, I won’t be buying that either.

  283. I would definitely be interested. I own an Xbox Series S, PS5, Switch, and PC. If a third-party game supports Xbox Play Anywhere, I always get it on Xbox so I have access on both console and PC.

  285. No. I’ve stuck with Xbox mainly for its exclusive games and physical media support, but going forward, Xbox no longer offers anything I want. A PS6 will probably still include a Blu-ray drive—even if it’s an add-on—and will almost certainly be cheaper than this rumored PC hybrid. I’ve never prioritized visual fidelity or high performance; otherwise, I’d use my PC more than my console. I have no interest in buying what’s essentially a prebuilt PC with an Xbox label. Microsoft’s shift toward Windows and away from Xbox exclusives has been disappointing over the last two console generations. As an Xbox gamer since 2001 with Halo CE, and having primarily used Xbox alongside Nintendo consoles, I no longer see Xbox as a distinct platform—just a glorified Windows app. I won’t be giving Microsoft my money again.

      1. Setting aside the jokes, I wouldn’t believe it until the console is actually in your hands and working. Microsoft has a history of generating excessive hype for potential features, only to ignore their audience when those features are dropped. They also tend to provide disappointing support.

        1. By audience, do you mean a subreddit full of people complaining?

          I often consider how many new people start gaming each year and how many reach a point in life where they can afford a gaming device.

          1. I don’t care where the complaints come from—whether forums, former Gawker sites, or elsewhere. Manufacturers tend to overpromise and underdeliver on features like this. Nintendo promised add-ons for older consoles that never materialized in the US, and Xbox and Sony have done the same. I believe console announcements should promise less from a consumer perspective.

          3. False advertising can damage a company’s reputation, and Microsoft seems to be taking a soft stance on it in my view. They’ve stopped releasing exclusives, acquired studios without clear purpose, and repeatedly raised hardware prices. How often have they promised features that either never arrived or appeared much later and more limited than expected?

            People choose consoles because they aren’t PCs. I left PC gaming years ago because the constant cost of upgrading components to keep up with games wasn’t worth it. Now we have figures like Randy Pitchford blaming consumers for not having the right hardware. That approach was never enjoyable for me—while I love playing games, the need for frequent incremental upgrades became too burdensome.

      3. Unless I can play my Xbox games on Windows, I’m skeptical. Their marketing push claiming “this is an Xbox” is misleading. If I can’t play my Xbox games on it, then it’s not an Xbox.

      5. If the hardware is truly capable, it could be an interesting idea. However, there’s no proof to suggest it will be like that—this is purely speculation at the moment.

  297. No, I have no reason to continue supporting Microsoft in the high-end console market. While the Series X has been excellent, they haven’t done enough to maintain buyer loyalty.

        2. I would watch if they made hardcore porn, but I expect the videos would just end with a blue screen.

          Edit: I’m being downvoted because the original poster edited their comment from “I wish they made hardcore.”

          1. I dated someone from 2008 to 2010 who used “Xbox” as a code word for something other than video games. She’d say, “I’ll come over and we can play Xbox,” and it was always a good time. It makes me nostalgic for when life was simpler and my knees didn’t hurt in the morning. For the younger crowd, enjoy life, travel, and don’t rush into adulthood—it’s not all it’s cracked up to be.

      1. I appreciate the ease of use with backward compatibility, but I’ve lost faith in Microsoft due to their other actions. While I don’t think Nintendo or Sony truly care about their customers either, Microsoft’s indifference is much more obvious.

    3. Yes, I would buy it. The Xbox Series X is the perfect console for me, especially since it offers fantastic backward compatibility. I skipped the Xbox One and went with the PS4 during that generation, so I’ve continued building my game library on PlayStation, especially now that Xbox games are coming to PS. The Series X will be my go-to for playing older games, particularly from the golden Xbox 360 era.

    9. I’ve felt burned by Xbox since the beginning. I got the original Xbox at launch in 2001 as my first console. While it started slow and had a short lifespan, it was exciting—but Microsoft announced the 360 just 2-3 years later and dropped support for the original Xbox almost overnight. In contrast, Sony supported the PS1 and PS2 for much longer.

      This pattern continued with the 360 generation. Despite issues like the red ring of death and unreliable hardware, I stuck with it for Halo and Call of Duty. But when the Xbox One launched, Microsoft focused on Kinect and TV features instead of improving hardware or delivering strong exclusives. The Xbox One struggled to compete with the PS4, and many promised exclusives were canceled.

      The Xbox One X was a step up, but it came too late to make a real impact. The Series S/X feel like more of the same, and Microsoft’s recent studio acquisitions haven’t inspired confidence given their track record with companies like Rare.

      After 25 years, it’s clear Microsoft’s corporate approach doesn’t align with what gamers want. While Nintendo and Sony have thrived by focusing on the right priorities, Microsoft continues to disappoint. I’m done with Xbox for the foreseeable future.

      1. Well said.

        I agree with every word, but I would do it all over again just for those Halo 2 and 3 multiplayer sessions. That was peak console gaming for me as a young adult. I don’t know what PlayStation gamers were doing then, but I know where I was every sleepless night.

          1. As an original Xbox Live beta tester, I remember playing Re-Volt and realizing the revolutionary aspect wasn’t the game itself—which was mediocre—but the ability to communicate with someone through an Ethernet cable and using the headset’s voice changer.

            Rainbow 6: Vegas was another first for me; I bought the $35 USB camera just to put my face on my in-game avatar. I’ve experienced many milestones on Xbox, so it’s difficult to see how things have evolved this generation.

            For PlayStation, the closest comparable game to Halo’s multiplayer was SOCOM Navy Seals. However, the PlayStation Network required buying and installing a network adapter, was cumbersome to configure, and generally a hassle to use.

          2. Absolutely. For me, the peak was 2006–2012 with games like Gears 1 and 2, Rainbow Six Vegas 1 and 2, Call of Duty from 4 through Black Ops 2, and Halo 3. I’ve been chasing that experience ever since.

            I really value the Xbox ecosystem—the controller, the party system, and Xbox Live back then were top-tier. I love my Series X, while my PS5 mostly collects dust. I’ve bought PlayStation consoles since the PS3 mainly for Uncharted and The Last of Us. But lately, Microsoft seems to be dropping the ball, and at this point, my next system will likely be whatever PlayStation console is available, paired with an Xbox-style controller.

          3. Yes, the best years for me were 2006 to 2012. I wasn’t great at Gears of War multiplayer, but the campaigns for the first three games were fantastic. I played Call of Duty after Black Ops 2, but it never felt as enjoyable afterward. It hasn’t been the same since.

        2. I purchased the $50 Best Buy warranty, which replaced two red-ringed Xbox 360s for me. The first console broke within a year, so the warranty covered it and remained active into the second year. When the second one failed, it was also replaced, but the warranty was then used up.

          I then bought another $50 warranty, which ultimately provided me with a third Xbox 360. The best part was that replacements were done in-store, avoiding the back-and-forth shipping required by Microsoft’s process.

          So, spending an extra $100 saved me the downtime of going through Microsoft’s free service three times, or the cost of buying three new consoles.

          1. If the next Xbox is a $1,000 powerhouse, I’d consider it, but I’d need to know what exclusive multiplayer games it offers that are on par with Halo 2 and 3. I’m a big fan of single-player games too, and I agree PlayStation had some of the best in that era, but multiplayer is key for me here.

      2. As someone who has owned multiple Xbox consoles without major issues like the red ring of death, I see the console itself as a reliable appliance—it just works. My fond memories come from the games, which would have been the same on PlayStation. There’s no need to treat console choice like a team rivalry or tie your identity to it. It’s just a tool for entertainment.

      3. If Sony or Nintendo released a $1,500 Pro console, I would buy it without hesitation because I trust their quality. However, I wouldn’t spend more than $100 on a next-gen Xbox at this point.

      4. The original Xbox launched between console generations, well after the PlayStation 2 had already been established. To compete, they had to prepare for the next generation from the start—otherwise they’d be at a disadvantage before even beginning. For example, expecting a game like Halo 3 to run on the original Xbox would have been unrealistic.

        1. The Xbox launched just a year after the PS2, so they were fairly balanced. However, Microsoft likely recognized the importance of an early release and launched the Xbox 360 a year ahead for that same strategic reason.

          1. The original Xbox launched in 2001, followed by the Xbox 360 in 2005, so there was a gap of about three to four years between console generations.

          2. No. The Xbox launched a year after the PS2, so Microsoft was already playing catch-up. They likely recognized the importance of an early release, which is why the Xbox 360 came out a year before the PS3.

            At that time, console cycles were about five years, so Microsoft was on schedule with the Xbox 360. However, the original Xbox’s late start gave them less development time for the 360, compounded by the EU’s lead-free solder requirement, which contributed to the Red Ring of Death. Meanwhile, the PS3 was delayed by a year.

            Considering the issues with the PS3 versus the Xbox One and how the market responded to both, it’s clear Microsoft was at a disadvantage despite the Xbox 360’s success. The Xbox 360 had several advantages:

            – A significantly lower price
            – More powerful hardware
            – An earlier release than the PS3
            – Stronger exclusive titles
            – Superior system software and services, like Xbox Live
            – Better overall software support

            Even with all these factors, the PS3 and Xbox 360 ended up with similar sales figures. In contrast, the Xbox One had less powerful hardware, included Kinect, and cost $100 more, leading to a significant drop in sales. After the Xbox One, competing became nearly impossible, as players were already invested in their existing ecosystems, friends, and game libraries.

      6. We originally bought an Xbox for Halo split-screen and even went online via PC before Xbox Live existed. Once Halo 2 launched with Xbox Live, that was our main game until the Xbox 360 arrived with cross-play, which mainly offered HD graphics. Many of us waited until Call of Duty: Black Ops to upgrade to the Xbox 360. I purchased an Elite model with HDMI, which lasted a few years until the disc tray started jamming. I sold it and bought a Slim Gears Special Edition, which still works perfectly today.

        I skipped the Xbox One, as I didn’t need a media center, and it was outsold by the PS4. Now, the Xbox Series X|S is performing even worse, with sales trailing not only the PS5 but also the older Xbox One. When the less powerful Series S outsells the more capable Series X—which is meant to compete directly with the highly successful PS5—it’s clear Microsoft is struggling to find direction.

        If I were buying a console today without any prior loyalty, I’d choose a PS5 over an Xbox Series X. There simply isn’t enough incentive to do otherwise, especially knowing Sony will continue supporting PS5 games on future consoles and has a massive user base, while Microsoft titles are also available on PC.

        As for a potential Xbox/PC hybrid, Microsoft should remember that for most people, a console’s primary purpose is playing games. Everything else is secondary, including Game Pass subscriptions for online play. I wasn’t fond of Xbox Live when it launched, but it was simpler than the PC connection workaround we used before. Now, with free online options like Fortnite and Valorant, breaking the paid online model could disrupt revenue streams—a move that would hurt Microsoft but impact Sony even more.

      7. As a longtime gamer, I prefer the simplicity of consoles over a gaming PC. I enjoy my Nintendo for certain games, but its FPS selection is lacking. I’ve never liked the PlayStation controller since the original model, whereas I’ve always preferred the Xbox controller. I’m excited about the possibility of this new Xbox allowing access to Sony games through Steam. During the Series years, I felt Xbox was missing the distinctive visual polish that Sony’s exclusives consistently deliver.

      8. This perfectly summarizes how they’ve managed the brand. I would love to see a new Xbox 360 era—that’s all I’ve asked for.

        Game Pass is great, cloud gaming could be good, and the console design is solid, but just give me games. If you exclude the major acquisitions of Bethesda and Activision, the game production has been poor. Spencer has failed miserably, and it’s time for him to go.

        I don’t understand the hype for a $1,000 console or the direction of this new Xbox. I’m done.

      9. Nintendo has made a series of poor hardware decisions, but they remain successful because their first-party titles offer a unique charm that’s hard to find elsewhere.

      10. I hadn’t heard of the capacitor issue before. My launch Xbox One still works fine; I just stopped using it.

        Nintendo and Sony have succeeded by creating walled ecosystems, which I don’t see as consumer-friendly. If you argued Steam’s success comes from doing right by customers, I’d agree. But Nintendo and Sony prioritize their own interests, not consumers’. Microsoft losing the Xbox One generation put them on an unrecoverable path.

        That said, I’m glad it happened because their shift toward open platforms is much better for consumers. This is the best possible outcome in my view.

        1. The capacitor issue was specific to the original Xbox, not the Xbox One, and it was the most common failure point for that model.

          Nintendo and Sony learned from their past missteps. All three companies attempted to expand beyond gaming, aiming to become central home entertainment hubs: Sony with the multimedia-focused PS3, Nintendo with the TV-oriented Wii U, and Microsoft with the all-in-one Xbox One.

          Each pursued the goal of a single device for everything, and each saw those consoles become their biggest failures. Sony and Nintendo then returned to basics, prioritizing games with the PS4 and Switch, which proved highly successful. Microsoft, however, shifted toward a Netflix-style subscription for games and pushing Xbox software onto other devices—initiatives that didn’t align with what gamers were asking for.

      1. My decision has nothing to do with my opinion of Microsoft. For $1,000, you could buy a gaming PC, which serves as both a gaming platform and a full computer. Knowing this and still spending that much on a console would be unwise, or at the very least, a poor financial choice.

  301. This would be a difficult decision for me. I’ve decided to stop using Game Pass because I can no longer justify the cost, which means I would need to buy games outright for this new console. If it’s a hybrid system that can access my Steam library, it would be an easy choice. However, if it’s limited to the Xbox store with no other options, that would be hard to accept. My instinct tells me it would still be smarter to get a PS6 for exclusive titles and use my gaming PC for everything else. I already have a secondary PC connected to my TV, and it’s surprisingly easy to use with a wireless keyboard featuring a trackpad and tools like Steam Big Picture.

    In short, if Xbox becomes that expensive without supporting other storefronts and game libraries like Steam, Epic, or GOG, I would have to pass.

  303. I would consider returning to Xbox, but I’ve been hesitant since the Red Ring of Death era, which affected me multiple times. Without compelling exclusives and with Game Pass prices doubling, I worry the platform will struggle to retain its player base.

  304. That’s essentially what they’ve suggested. It will be a dedicated gaming machine with premium hardware, unifying your entire Xbox library. That sounds good to me. While I have a capable PC, I wouldn’t mind adding a midrange device focused solely on gaming.

  306. I prefer a good baseline console, like the Series S for this generation, that also runs Windows. Dev mode was a major reason I bought the Series S, and adding Windows would make it a single device that does everything. For me, $1,000 is just too much for a console.

  307. Microsoft’s strategy typically involves multiple tiers. I expect a $600 base Xbox 6S competing directly with the PS6, alongside a $1000-$1200 premium Xbox 6X featuring PC hybrid capabilities and a GPU comparable to a 9070.

    1. If the next Xbox uses PC hardware, we could end up with multiple devices running the same software. Since console generations typically last around seven years, competitors might release annual hardware updates that outperform the premium Xbox model over time.

      This is similar to the handheld market, where devices like the ASUS ROG Ally share similar hardware with competitors. This raises the question: is the ASUS handheld also an Xbox? If so, the Xbox brand could risk becoming outdated if other hardware runs the same games with better performance and at a more competitive price.

      1. Modern consoles are essentially built on PC hardware, as we’ve moved away from custom designs long ago. The main differences now lie in the user interface and ecosystem, though even those distinctions are becoming less clear. For example, your smartphone is fundamentally a personal computer, but its interaction and ecosystem define it as a phone. Technology has advanced to where functionality overlaps significantly across devices, with PCs at the core.

        In terms of capabilities, consoles have functioned like PCs for some time. Now, with development costs soaring beyond $200 million, locking them into closed ecosystems is no longer practical or financially viable.

      2. Microsoft is shifting away from selling hardware and encouraging OEMs to produce Xbox-branded devices instead. This next Xbox will likely be their final attempt at a traditional console, with the goal of having companies like Asus or MSI create Xbox-PC hybrid systems to transition users to PC gaming.

  308. It really depends.

    I stopped investing in Xbox after the Xbox One, which broke the trust built during the OG and 360 eras.

    I also believe the Series S was a mistake that has hampered the Series X’s success and Xbox as a hardware brand. The fact that the Series S outsold the Series X for so long was problematic, as most Xbox gamers weren’t on the flagship hardware.

    Then there’s the discless, expensive Series X model. The Series X is positioned as a backwards-compatible powerhouse, but that relies on having a disc drive for older generations. Removing it makes no sense.

    If the next Xbox is backwards compatible, includes a disc drive, and can play games from my existing PC library, then count me in.

  309. I would only consider it if it were a PC-console hybrid. I’d pay up to $1,200 for a device that lets me access my entire PC gaming library while also playing through my console backlog.

  314. Why are we even considering this? The console war ended last generation. The next generation will be about streaming, and I’m excited to see how it unfolds. In the next few years, the way we play games will be completely different.

  316. I recently bought a PC with a 9800x3d and 5070ti, plus a G18 laptop with a 5080. I expect these will keep me well-equipped for years and outperform the next generation of consoles.

  318. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a version with more storage for $1,200 or more. It will be a tough choice, especially if it can play Steam games. I think most people would prefer to wait for the Steam machine next year and finally end that yearly Xbox subscription.

  319. With the rising costs of essentials like food, gas, and electricity, many people can’t realistically afford a next-generation console. Even if you can, what precedent is Microsoft setting by pricing it so high?

  320. As someone who already owns a more powerful PC than what would likely be in that console, I don’t see a reason to buy it. Anyone looking for better quality or higher frame rates in games can already build a PC now.

    That said, I do think it’s a good idea and has been a long time coming.

  323. I’m not concerned about whether it’s more powerful than PlayStation. I primarily want it for Game Pass, and I expect it to boot directly into the Xbox dashboard, even if it’s redesigned. Backwards compatibility with very old titles isn’t essential, but I’d appreciate it if my recent digital purchases still worked.

    If future Xbox titles are PC-based, I want them to feel designed for the console and run natively. Ultimately, I’d like it to feel like a more powerful version of the current Xbox, with access to additional storefronts.

  324. We won’t know if it’s “twice as powerful as the PS6” until the PS6 presumably releases a year later.

    For me, the only way I’d buy one is if it runs Steam. This comes from someone who has bought every Xbox at launch. Microsoft gives me no reason to stay in their ecosystem if they maintain a walled garden. Open it up, and I’m in.

  325. I would likely buy it, but at that price, I’d wait. I’m invested in the Xbox ecosystem, find value in Game Pass, require backward compatibility, and appreciate Play Anywhere. The possibility of Bethesda games being timed exclusives for Xbox makes PlayStation 6 a non-starter for me. The only way I’d switch to PS6 is if Xbox ceased to exist entirely.

  326. As a casual player, I don’t see the need for a $1000 console. My Xbox X gets more use streaming movies and TV shows than playing games—I have over 100 hours in a few games but thousands in entertainment. If anything, I’d lean toward the next PlayStation, since it will offer both Xbox and PlayStation games. I rarely use Steam or Game Pass.

Antwort hinterlassen