16 Comments

  1. Starting with just $100 at Schwab is exactly how I began investing a few years ago, and I appreciate the article’s point about using it to gain experience before adding more. I put my first $100 into a low-cost S&P 500 index fund, which felt like a stable way to learn the ropes without too much stress. For others just starting, do you think a single ETF or a fractional share of a well-known company is a better first move?

    1. Thanks for sharing your own start with that S&P 500 index fund—that’s a classic and sensible first move. For a new investor with $100, a single broad-market ETF like SCHB or SCHX can provide instant diversification, which I’d generally favor over a single fractional share for that foundational first investment. Once you’re comfortable, you could explore Schwab’s Stock Slices to try a basket of individual stocks. I’d be curious to hear how your own portfolio has evolved since that initial investment.

  2. Starting with just $100 at Schwab is exactly how I began investing a few years ago, and I appreciate the article’s point about using it to gain experience before adding more. My first move was into a low-cost S&P 500 index fund, which felt like a stable way to learn the ropes without overcomplicating things. For others just starting, do you think a single ETF or a fractional share of a well-known company is a better confidence-builder?

    1. Thanks for sharing your experience—starting with an S&P 500 index fund is a solid choice that aligns perfectly with learning the ropes. For a $100 start, a single broad-market ETF like SCHB or SCHX can offer instant diversification and simplicity, which often builds confidence better than a single fractional stock. You might explore Schwab’s ETF screener to compare options, and I’d love to hear what you decide to try next.

  3. Starting with just $100 at Schwab is exactly how I began investing a few years ago, and I appreciate the article’s point about using it to gain experience before adding more. My first move was into a low-cost S&P 500 ETF, which felt like a stable way to learn the ropes without too much stress. For others just starting, do you think broad index funds are still the most straightforward path, or are there other beginner-friendly assets worth considering first?

    1. Thanks for sharing your experience—starting with an S&P 500 ETF was a smart and straightforward choice. Broad index funds are still an excellent first step for beginners, as they offer instant diversification and low costs; you might also explore Schwab’s own target-date index funds or a simple money market fund for even lower volatility while you learn. I’d love to hear how your portfolio has evolved since those early days—feel free to share an update on what you’ve learned along the way.

  4. Since you’re likely young, I should point out that there’s no truly “stable option” in investing. You could hold bonds and earn very little, or invest in stocks and endure the downturns that are bound to occur.

    A practical approach is to put 90% of your money into an S&P 500 fund like VOO, and use the remaining 10% to pick an individual stock. This lets you learn firsthand why stock-picking is generally not recommended. You may lose that 10%, but it will be a small, two-digit lesson rather than a costly five-digit mistake later on.

    Stick with this strategy over the next 35 years, and you could retire as a multimillionaire.

Leave a Reply