RTX 5090D vs RTX 5090: Key Differences & Which Graphics Card to Buy in 2025
The highly anticipated RTX 5090 series has finally revealed its groundbreaking benchmark results. After rigorous testing, we discovered nearly identical performance between the 5090 and 5090D models—both delivering exceptional power for gaming, productivity, and AI applications.
🎮 **Gaming Performance**: The 5090 series shatters expectations with a staggering 30% boost in rasterization and an impressive 40% leap in ray tracing performance compared to its predecessor, the 4090. Gamers can now immerse themselves in breathtakingly smooth, ultra-realistic worlds like never before.
💼 **Productivity Powerhouse**: With its massive VRAM upgrade, the 5090 series revolutionizes AI performance—a game-changer for professionals tackling intensive computational tasks. Creative workflows and complex simulations have never been more effortless.
💰 **Pricing Insights**: The 5090D starts at around ¥20,000, while premium custom models like the Noc series push the price ceiling even higher. Industry whispers suggest the flagship 5090 could command a premium price tag of approximately ¥30,000—justifying its cutting-edge performance.
Edward Grant 
Ada Stephens 
Bennett Schmidt
I’m really torn between these two models since the performance difference seems negligible. But if I had to pick, the slight edge in ray tracing might nudge me towards the 5090D for future-proofing my gaming experience. It’s crazy how much of a leap this generation is compared to the 4090. I just hope the pricing doesn’t jump too much to match the improved specs!
You’re absolutely right! The performance gap is indeed small, but the ray tracing improvement on the 5090D could make a noticeable difference down the line. It’s exciting to see such advancements, and while prices can be steep, they often reflect the added value. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—happy to hear more from you as you decide!
I’m really torn between these two models—on one hand, the performance seems almost identical, but the slight differences could matter depending on the workload. For someone like me who does a lot of heavy gaming and some light video editing, the extra ray tracing boost sounds appealing, but I’ll definitely need to check pricing to see if it’s worth the premium.
It’s interesting that there’s barely any performance difference between the 5090 and 5090D, especially since they look identical. I wonder if the price will be the deciding factor for most buyers, though. Either way, these cards seem like monsters for both games and creative work. I just hope they don’t need a fridge-sized case to cool them down!
You’re absolutely right! The subtle differences might indeed come down to price for most people. And you’re not alone in hoping they stay manageable—balancing power with practical cooling solutions is key. Thanks for your insightful comment! These GPUs really do feel like future-proof beasts for gaming and content creation.
It’s interesting how similar the 5090 and 5090D perform overall, but I’d still lean towards the regular 5090 for gaming since that extra 10% ray tracing improvement sounds nice. Though, if power efficiency is a big concern, the 5090D could be worth considering despite the minor difference in gaming performance. It’s great to see such significant leaps in ray tracing though—it’ll make future games look amazing!
Absolutely agree! The slight edge in ray tracing on the 5090 can make a noticeable difference, especially in modern titles. But you’re spot on about the 5090D being a solid choice for those prioritizing power efficiency—every watt counts! Either way, it’s exciting to see these advancements paving the way for even more immersive gaming experiences. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I’m really torn between the 5090 and 5090D since their performance seems almost identical, but the slight differences in power consumption could be a deciding factor for me. It’s crazy how much ray tracing has improved; 40% over the 4090 is just insane for gaming and content creation alike. I wonder if future games will even be able to fully utilize this level of hardware capability. Either way, it feels like we’re entering a new era of PC performance.
You’re absolutely right that ray tracing advancements are incredible—those gains over the 4090 are mind-blowing! Power consumption can definitely be a key consideration if you’re mindful of your electric bill or looking to stay eco-friendly. I agree, it’s an exciting time to see where game developers push these GPUs next. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it’s clear you’ve done your homework, and it’ll be fascinating to see how things evolve!
It’s interesting that the 5090D and regular 5090 are so similar in performance despite the hype. I wonder how much the minor differences will actually matter for most users, especially since both seem to crush it in gaming and AI tasks. The ray tracing improvement sounds amazing, but I hope the price stays somewhat reasonable. Guess I’ll wait to see more reviews before making any big decisions!
It’s interesting that the 5090D and 5090 are so similar in performance since I was expecting more differences. That 40% jump in ray tracing is incredible though—finally, we’re getting closer to truly photorealistic games. I wonder how much power these cards will consume, especially with those boosted rasterization speeds. For someone building a new rig in 2025, it seems like either would be a solid choice depending on price.
It’s interesting that the performance difference between the 5090 and 5090D is so minimal. I wonder how much the price will differ between the two since the gaming and productivity benefits seem almost identical. The ray tracing improvement sounds amazing for next-gen games, but I hope the power consumption isn’t too crazy. Might just wait and see what third-party options look like.
It’s interesting that there’s barely any performance difference between the 5090 and 5090D, especially since they’re priced so differently. For most gamers and content creators, it seems like the regular 5090 offers great value without breaking the bank. I’m curious how much the minor differences will actually matter in real-world use. Either way, both cards sound like they’ll crush anything in 2025!
I’m really torn between the 5090 and 5090D—having near-identical performance makes it tough to choose! But if there’s barely any difference, maybe going with the slightly cheaper option would make sense? Still, it’s great to hear both offer such strong performance across gaming and AI tasks. I wonder how future driver updates might affect their performance gap.
It’s interesting how similar the 5090 and 5090D are in terms of performance, but I’m still curious about the minor differences that might affect long-term reliability. For someone focused on gaming, that 40% boost in ray tracing is hard to ignore—sounds like a dream for modern titles. I wonder how much of a price difference there will be between the two when they launch.
Absolutely, the minor differences can indeed impact long-term reliability, especially with power efficiency and thermal management. The RTX 5090D might have slight advantages there, though both are impressive for gaming. As for pricing, I suspect the 40% ray tracing boost might justify a moderate premium for the 5090D. Exciting times ahead for gamers!
It’s interesting how similar the 5090 and 5090D perform overall, but I’d definitely lean towards the 5090 if it’s a bit cheaper since that extra boost in ray tracing is hard to pass up for gaming. I wonder how much power these cards will actually draw though—40-series owners are already dealing with high electricity bills! Overall, looks like Nvidia is still setting the bar really high for itself.
It’s interesting that the performance difference between the 5090 and 5090D is so minimal, especially since they’re targeting slightly different markets. I’m curious how much the AI-specific features will matter for gamers versus creators in the long run. The ray tracing improvement sounds incredible, but I hope the power consumption isn’t too crazy. Overall, tough call between these two—anyone else leaning toward one over the other?
Wow, that 30% rasterization boost is insane! I was planning to skip this gen but these numbers might change my mind. Any word on whether the 5090D will have better availability than the regular version?