My primary motivation for considering a 4K setup is to future-proof my home entertainment system. I want to avoid purchasing DVDs or Blu-rays only to upgrade later when a special movie is released in 4K. I tend to hold onto electronics for as long as possible—my current setup includes a Mac mini 2012 and M1, and I only retired my 2007 model earlier this year.
While I enjoy movies, I wouldn’t call myself a cinephile. My collection consists mainly of older television series, which I only started gathering this year. This raises the question of whether investing in 4K is truly worthwhile for me. I’ve seen discussions about upscaling older films, but few address television series specifically, making me wonder if a high-end 4K player is necessary. Additionally, there seems to be little conversation around 4K television series in general.
I already own a PS4, but upgrading to a PS5 doesn’t appeal to me, especially with the expectation that the PS6 may be announced by the end of next year, based on Sony’s past release patterns.
Many enthusiasts recommend the Panasonic DP-UB820, but its recent price increase—from around $375–$425 to approximately $535 on Amazon—feels excessive. In contrast, the Panasonic DP-UB450 has maintained a stable price, though I’m curious whether it will remain affordable until Black Friday.
Of course, the television itself is another key consideration. I’m weighing whether to prioritize features in the TV over the player and am currently considering 55″ models like the Hisense U7/U8 or TCL QM7K, based on Rtings recommendations. Although I’d prefer a 45–50″ screen, those sizes are significantly more expensive than the 55″ options I’m exploring.

I totally relate to wanting to future-proof, especially since you mentioned holding onto electronics like your 2012 Mac mini. For older TV series, I’ve found that my 4K TV does a decent job upscaling DVDs, but the real jump comes from true HD or 4K sources, which are still rare for classic shows. My next step is actually checking which of my favorite series even have 4K remasters before investing in a dedicated player—have you found a good resource for that?
I completely understand your point about checking for 4K remasters first—it’s a smart move. A great resource I’ve used is Blu-ray.com’s database, where you can search for specific series and see if they’ve received a 4K, Blu-ray, or even a high-definition digital release. It really helps prioritize which purchases would actually benefit from a 4K setup. Let me know if you find any gems in your collection that got the upgrade!
I totally relate to your point about holding onto electronics—my living room TV is from 2015, and I only upgraded when the HDR difference became undeniable for movies. Since you mentioned your collection is mainly older TV series, I’d say a mid-range 4K player with good upscaling might be a smarter move than a high-end one, as true 4K remasters for older shows are still pretty rare. Has anyone found a particular series that actually looks dramatically better in 4K?
Thanks for sharing your experience—it’s smart to wait for a meaningful upgrade like HDR. You’re right that true 4K remasters of older TV series are uncommon, but a notable exception is “Star Trek: The Original Series”; the recent 4K release, remastered from original film, shows a dramatic improvement in detail and color. I’d suggest checking Blu-ray.com’s forum for user reviews on specific series upgrades before deciding. Have you come across any other series that surprised you with a 4K remaster?
I totally relate to your point about holding onto electronics—my living room TV is from 2015, and I only upgraded when the HDR difference became impossible to ignore for my favorite nature documentaries. Since you mentioned your collection is mainly older TV series, I’d say the upscaling on a good 4K TV might surprise you, but a dedicated 4K player could be overkill unless you start buying new 4K discs. What older series are you hoping will get a 4K release someday?
Thanks for sharing your experience—it’s smart to wait for a meaningful upgrade like HDR for nature docs. For older TV series, the upscaling on modern 4K TVs can indeed enhance detail noticeably, but as you noted, a 4K player may not be essential unless you dive into new discs. I’d suggest checking sites like Blu-ray.com for specific series to see if any 4K remasters are announced, and I’d love to hear which shows you’re hoping to see in higher resolution!
I totally relate to holding onto electronics forever—my living room TV is from 2015, so I’ve also wondered if jumping to 4K is worth it for my old DVD sets. Your point about the lack of discussion around 4K for television series really hits home, since most of my viewing is classic shows too. I’m leaning toward just using a streaming device for now and seeing how the physical media landscape evolves. What’s the oldest piece of tech you’re still using daily?
I completely get the hesitation, especially with a trusty 2015 TV and a library of classic shows on DVD—that’s a very common scenario. For those older series, a good streaming device with strong upscaling can be a great middle ground, as the vast majority aren’t available on 4K Blu-ray anyway. I’m still using a 2012 Mac mini for a specific media server task, so I understand the longevity appeal; let me know what you decide for your setup!
If you’re considering 4K, I’d recommend prioritizing display quality over resolution. I prefer watching standard Blu-ray on an OLED screen over 4K on an LCD. My advice is to buy the largest OLED you can afford and upgrade your source material later. When you’re ready, the Panasonic 420 and 450 are both solid, reasonably priced options.
It sounds like you may not have seen the latest mini-LED displays, which are a type of LCD. I wouldn’t recommend switching to 1080p just for OLED.
Stick with Blu-ray and DVD. Blu-ray offers a substantial improvement in quality, while 4K is only about a 10–15% upgrade over Blu-ray for most titles. Depending on your equipment and preferences, you’ll likely be satisfied with DVD and Blu-ray.
The UB820 is good for upscaling DVDs on a newer 4K TV, but the difference is minimal—around 10% or less compared to your TV’s built-in upscaling, and it only applies to DVDs.
There are very few TV shows available in 4K, though that may change over time. 4K TVs and movies are expensive, requiring a new TV, player, and costly discs that keep rising in price.
If you’re happy with what you have, there’s no need to upgrade. Ignorance is bliss.
4K Blu-ray is about 20% impressive on high-end setups like OLED TVs with Dolby Atmos, but only 2% noticeable with a cheaper TV and soundbar. Part of the appeal is FOMO and the placebo effect—sometimes we focus too much on small details rather than the movie itself.
I don’t regret my choice, as I own around 600 4K movies and have a 77″ OLED, UB820, gaming consoles, and a 7.2.4 Atmos system. But I recognize I’m spending money on something that isn’t twice as good as what I had before—I just have the means to do so.
But Seinfeld in 4K!
If you’re asking that many questions, it sounds like you’re looking for a reason not to buy it.
I’m asking because no one seems to be discussing 4K in relation to television shows. If you have any relevant links on this topic, please share them.
Only about 10–15% of TV shows are released in 4K, and many aren’t released physically at all or only come out on Blu-ray. If you don’t want to invest a couple thousand dollars in a high-quality TV and an upscaling Blu-ray player, I wouldn’t worry about 4K.
I personally collect my favorite TV shows and always choose 4K when available. Currently, my 4K collection includes HBO series like *The Last of Us* and *House of the Dragon*, Disney Marvel shows, *Reacher*, *Halo*, *Dune*, and *Fallout*. Out of around 60 complete series and a couple thousand movies, I always opt for 4K when possible, which should give you an idea of my preference.
Either invest in a setup that upscales your current collection for a better viewing experience, or save money with a more affordable TV. Many collectors appreciate the quality upgrade 4K offers, but it is an investment. Based on your post, I’d suggest skipping 4K unless you’re aiming for the best possible quality from your Blu-rays.
4K TV shows on physical media are a niche within a niche and have limited market presence, which is unlikely to improve. Most 4K production focuses on movies.
Don’t ask us; we’re all enthusiasts here.
To determine if 4K is right for you, consider your viewing distance and screen size. If you sit far from a small screen, you may not notice the difference. Also, ensure your content is available in 4K and that your hardware supports it.
The only valid response is that it depends on your specific needs and setup.
Whether 4K is right for you depends on your viewing distance and screen size. If you sit close enough to notice the extra detail, it can be worth it. Otherwise, you might not see a significant difference from 1080p.
We need more releases of Lawrence of Arabia on disc.
The most important factor is your TV. Models like the UB420, 450, or 820 are solid choices, but without a decent TV, you might be underwhelmed by the results. The players you’re considering are good budget to mid-tier options, but keep in mind Black Friday is approaching. Check out r/4ktv for recommendations within your budget.
While there are some series available in 4K, many are still only on Blu-ray. Even if you don’t upgrade to a 4K player immediately, improving your TV will enhance your enjoyment of the content you already own.
The QM7K is a great value and would definitely benefit from an upgrade to 4K, especially if you’re coming from an older, lower-resolution TV.
Many HBO and Paramount series are available in 4K. A 4K player is worth it for the upscaling feature, which works very well with Blu-rays. I use a UB820, and it makes Blu-rays look like 4K on a quality screen like my 83-inch LG C4 OLED. The improvement is noticeable.
Most TV shows are released on Blu-ray and will likely remain that way, as physical media is becoming a niche market. I collect only 4K movies unless a title is only on Blu-ray. For TV shows, I stick with Blu-ray and avoid DVDs, as DVDs look poor on large screens even with upscaling.
Having 4K capability is a smart choice. If it’s an option, go for 4K, but Blu-ray will serve you well for the next 10–15 years. Higher resolutions may emerge, but probably not on physical media. Owning physical copies ensures you can watch your favorites whenever you want, especially since streaming content often disappears quickly.
As for TVs, decide whether you want the best viewing experience or the most affordable one. In a 4K forum, you’ll get varied opinions, but I recommend the LG C5 OLED 55-inch for a top-tier experience at around $1,127. It’s expensive but offers excellent value. If you’ve never experienced OLED, a cheaper LED will work fine, though 4K content won’t look as impressive. It’s about half the cost with a significant drop in picture quality, so if it fits your budget, you may not mind the difference.
You can probably skip 4K. There aren’t many TV shows available in the format, and with your current setup—or lack thereof—it’s not worth it. There are plenty of Blu-rays available at reasonable prices.
Unless you’re a big Seinfeld fan, the selection of older TV shows available in 4K is quite limited. I collect 4K content, but for most TV series, I’m just happy to have them on good-quality Blu-rays.
We started collecting 4K Blu-rays in 2016 when the format launched. It’s an excellent format, and HDR and Dolby Vision really enhance the experience.
My honest answer is no. While I strongly support physical media and 4K specifically, I admit it can lead to multiple expensive hobbies. If you get hooked, you may want to upgrade your collection, TV, sound system, Blu-ray player, seating, and possibly even venture into audiophile territory. It becomes costly, so unless you have a genuine passion, disposable income, and are comfortable spending on what you love, I’d recommend avoiding it.
I bought a 75-inch TCL Q7 a couple of years ago as my first TV after moving out, and it’s been great for watching 4K content on my PS5. While OLED TVs are impressive, I’ve been very happy with my TV for the flat $1,000 price. The PS5 has also been a solid player, so if the PS6 includes a disc drive, that’s the route I’d take for console gaming.
I’d also recommend an AVR with Atmos speakers if possible. Even when gaming on my PC through the TV, the Atmos setup makes the experience much more immersive. I found a nice 5.1.4 speaker set on Facebook Marketplace for $320 and spent $600 on the AVR. One of the best things about going with an AVR is that you can start with a basic setup and add more speakers as your budget allows.
My collection is stored behind my weight rack.
Based on your description, standard Blu-ray seems like the ideal choice for you. DVD could also be a good option.